|
[Sponsors] |
March 3, 2014, 11:10 |
2D Simulations in CFX
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 361
Rep Power: 14 |
I fully understand CFX is a 3D solver - to solve in 2D you need to extrude the geometry one cell thick (or if you import a Fluent .msh mesh CFX Pre extrudes it one cell thick automatically).
However why is this such a problem? I hear many people complain that CFX doesn't do 2D. So what? Am I missing something? Wont a 2.5D simulation in CFX give the same results as a 2D simulation in Fluent? Can someone explain why people have issues with accepting that CFX does 2D simulations slightly differently? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Different result in CFX and fluent for mass trans.? is segregated better? | ftab | CFX | 7 | September 27, 2012 07:57 |
Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL | Val | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 10, 2011 02:20 |
nozzle/jet cfx simulations | steven | CFX | 4 | September 24, 2006 16:03 |
CFX 10's solutions differ from CFX 5.7's | Atit Koonsrisuk | CFX | 4 | July 26, 2006 11:59 |
CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 04:07 |