CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Inquiry of Particle initial condition setup

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 19, 2018, 22:22
Default Inquiry of Particle initial condition setup
  #1
Member
 
Jinwhan Ryuk
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: South Korea
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 13
Whitebear is on a distinguished road
Is it possible to setup a certain height of particle in a box as a initial condition in ANSYS CFX? It is to see the movement of particle from 0 to a certain velocity by bottom inlet air nozzle.
Whitebear is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 20, 2018, 02:20
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,727
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
If you are doing Lagrangian particle tracking then you can define particle injection regions anywhere you like. If you are doing rigid body 6DOF models then you can also define the starting point to be where ever you like.

If you would like more assistance please describe what you are trying to do more thoroughly.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 21, 2018, 00:12
Default
  #3
Member
 
Jinwhan Ryuk
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: South Korea
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 13
Whitebear is on a distinguished road
There is no movement of sand in CFB boiler in the beginnig of combustion. So, I want to simulate this. Before running CFB boiler sand has been located in boiler a certain height. The purpose of this to get sand erosion rate on CFB boiler and cyclone walls.
Whitebear is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 21, 2018, 05:04
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,727
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Please define your acronyms. I assume CFB means circulating fluidised bed - but remember not everybody works in your industry and knows all the acronyms.

This sounds like a complex simulation. You need to start with a fluidised bed combustion model - which is a complex model in itself. Once you have this model working you can add sand, presumably as lagrangian particles, and get the sand trajectories and wall erosion rates. There are going to be many challenges in getting this simulation working, I hope you are an experienced CFD person with plenty of time for careful model development and validation.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 21, 2018, 19:33
Default
  #5
Member
 
Jinwhan Ryuk
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: South Korea
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 13
Whitebear is on a distinguished road
Sorry for using acronyms and thank you for your help. I wanted to solve errosion first and then combustion later but I will try as your advice.
Whitebear is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 21, 2018, 19:38
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,727
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Whether you do combustion or erosion first is not important. The important thing is that you introduce the complex physics one step at a time so you can get it working properly before you add the next bit of complex physics.

So I suspect you should start with a fluidised bed simulation. When that is running successfully you can add sand particles and start erosion modelling. And when that is running successfully you can add combustion.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam: maximum number of iterations excedeed. Nkl OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 19 October 10, 2019 02:42
Segmentation fault when using reactingFOAM for Fluids Tommy Floessner OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 April 22, 2018 12:30
pressure in incompressible solvers e.g. simpleFoam chrizzl OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 13 March 28, 2017 05:49
Unstabil Simulation with chtMultiRegionFoam mbay101 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 13 December 28, 2013 13:12
Micro Scale Pore, icoFoam gooya_kabir OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 November 2, 2013 13:58


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:10.