|
[Sponsors] |
May 12, 2005, 10:16 |
problem about solve areocoefficients
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
When I solved teh Areocoefficient of one aircraft by CFX5.7.1, I found it was different when I use M=0.4 and M=0.2.when teh Cl=0.398,Cd=0.0298, M=0.4:and the same case,Cl=0.357,Cd=0.0275,M=0.2.Why??
Regards W0er |
|
May 13, 2005, 07:49 |
Re: problem about solve areocoefficients
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Those numbers are not far off what you would expect if you just applied the Prandtl-Glauert correction.
|
|
May 14, 2005, 09:19 |
Re: problem about solve areocoefficients
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Oh charles ,but i didn't get the results what differ from the Re number.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Solve single but higher order equation by OF 1.6 suffering Problem | alundilong | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 0 | December 23, 2010 13:53 |
Can CFX solve problem with structured mesh? | Peted | CFX | 2 | May 31, 2004 23:45 |
how to solve this problem in CFX5 calculation? | cfxbeginer | CFX | 2 | May 1, 2003 08:55 |
Can I use fluent to solve this multiphase problem | Steven | FLUENT | 1 | January 24, 2003 20:52 |
Can FLUENT solve this type of problem? | Whitaker | FLUENT | 3 | October 23, 2000 03:01 |