|
[Sponsors] |
May 23, 2013, 19:16 |
Particle Trapped on The Wall
|
#1 |
Member
Liliana de Luca Xavier Augusto
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello!
I am working with particles in a unique domain. But I need to know how many particles deposit on the wall in three different portions (like if I divided my domain in three). So, in CFD post, I created cross-section planes and calculate the mass flow of the particles using the function calculators. But I have a problem: in some portions recircuations zones exists, so the mass flow are bigger than the real number of particles. Anybody could help me? Anyone have an idea to divided my domain in three parts and then calculated how many particles deposition in each parts? Thanks in advance! |
|
May 23, 2013, 19:33 |
|
#2 |
Member
Liliana de Luca Xavier Augusto
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 13 |
I forgot to say: I am using Eulerian-Lagrangian approach.
|
|
May 23, 2013, 21:35 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
S.Bogoda
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
If you assigned 3 boundaries (wall1, wall2,wall3) in CFX-pre and then you can see in out put file, there is a summary of particle tracking, "particles on wall..". |
|
May 23, 2013, 21:43 |
|
#4 |
Member
Liliana de Luca Xavier Augusto
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 13 |
let me see if i understood...
i have to set 3 boundary conditions in cfx-pre? i'm kind of new in CFD.. sorry! But for this, I need to have 3 different geometries? Like 3 domains? |
|
May 23, 2013, 21:55 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
S.Bogoda
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 13 |
hi, If I understand your problem correctly,
in cfx-pre, you have to assign 1st domain and then boundaries under domain. there you can assign 3 walls separately. |
|
May 23, 2013, 21:59 |
|
#6 |
Member
Liliana de Luca Xavier Augusto
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 13 |
Okay! I think I got the idea!
I was wondering if there was another way to do this. But I can't think in another way! I believe that the 3 domains will solve my problem! Thanks so much, Sakura! |
|
May 23, 2013, 22:06 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
S.Bogoda
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 13 |
hi hi, you don't need 3 domains, you can define one domain and boundaries as,
inlet, outlet, wall1, wall2, wall3 and so on. |
|
January 2, 2020, 07:54 |
|
#8 | |
New Member
Erfan Jabari
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 6 |
Quote:
could you please explain how you calculate the mass flow of the particles using the function calculators? thank you |
||
January 3, 2020, 04:54 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,835
Rep Power: 27 |
In the output file, a list is present showing you the mass of particles escaping through a wall, or leaving through an outlet.
|
|
January 3, 2020, 07:47 |
|
#10 |
New Member
Erfan Jabari
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 6 |
Hello Gert
Which file do you mean? My flow contains air and particle but in function calculator we can not calculate mass flow of the particle it calculate the total mass of air and particle.what is your idea? Thank you |
|
January 3, 2020, 07:51 |
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,835
Rep Power: 27 |
Every CFX calculation comes with an output file (.out-file). It contains the text that you see when running your calculation in the CFX-solver manager. At the bottom of this file you see a summary of all kind of things, including a mass distribution of all your particles when escaping on a wall, or leaving through an outlet. Please note, particles that bounce back from a wall are not included.
|
|
January 3, 2020, 07:57 |
|
#12 | |
New Member
Erfan Jabari
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 6 |
Quote:
Is there this option(this file) in fluent? |
||
January 3, 2020, 08:02 |
|
#13 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,835
Rep Power: 27 |
Not that I am aware of. Possibly you can run a report in the Fluent GUI after running your calculation?
CFX producing an output file is one of the main reasons I use CFX all the time. I always use CFX, unless a client asks me to use Fluent. |
|
January 3, 2020, 08:09 |
|
#14 |
New Member
Erfan Jabari
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 6 |
My purpose is to produce number of escaped particle as a output parameter because i need this parameter in optimization part(NSGA-II).how can I do it?
|
|
January 3, 2020, 08:26 |
|
#15 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,835
Rep Power: 27 |
In Fluent? I have no idea.
During a CFX-calculation, you get a summary of all particles in text format. Say, you have 1000 particles on the inlet, then 100 go to walls (escape), 800 leave the calculation (outlet), others are trapped (time of distance excape), integration error, etc. If you have only 1 outlet, then 800 is your number. If you have multiple outlets, you get the information as mass on each outlet, but only at the end of the calculation (bottompart of output file). If all particles have the same mass, then you can easily calculate back how many particles you have on each outlet. Do you want to setup an automatic parameterization study with this info in the Workbench environment? Then contact ANSYS support since this is not trivial. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DPM particle trapped | Stefano | FLUENT | 6 | January 3, 2020 07:31 |
wall surface and particle surface reactions | borhan_sd@yahoo.com | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 18, 2017 09:24 |
Particle tracking trapped or incomplete | Abigail | FLUENT | 5 | July 30, 2015 10:37 |
[mesh manipulation] mergeMeshes problem | Attesz | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | July 29, 2015 04:15 |
Check particle impaction with User Fortran | Julian K. | CFX | 3 | January 12, 2012 09:46 |