CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

out-file interpretation: interpolation mapping

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By ghorrocks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 9, 2022, 10:20
Default out-file interpretation: interpolation mapping
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3
ckm2 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I adapt a steady state simulation for a transient run and used the simulation result as initial condition for a transient run.
For the transient run I used profile transformation, therefore I had to copy a domain(mesh) 12 times with Turbo-Rotation.

In CFX-Pre at Simulation Control/Execution Control I defined the initial conditions. I added an Interpolation Mapping Object (TurboRot 12x) for the selected Domain and started the Simulation.

Currently the Simulation is running, but I have a question about how to interpret the following lines in the .out-file:


Total Number of Nodes in the Target Domain = 8162613
Bounding Box Volume of the Target Mesh = 1.80652E-03

Checking user defined source locations from
"Initial Values 1: Interpolation Mapping 2":

Searching for Candidate Source Domains:
Loop over all copies from domain "DLPT"
defined in "Initial Values 1: Interpolation Mapping 2":
Copy No. 1:
Number of Mapped Nodes = 691510 ( 8.5%)
Bounding Box Overlap Volume = 2.26829E-04 ( 12.6%)
Copy No. 2:
Number of Mapped Nodes = 691510 ( 8.5%)
Bounding Box Overlap Volume = 2.30252E-04 ( 12.7%)
Copy No. 3:
Number of Mapped Nodes = 691510 ( 8.5%)
Bounding Box Overlap Volume = 2.46616E-04 ( 13.7%)
Copy No. 4:
Number of Mapped Nodes = 691510 ( 8.5%)
Bounding Box Overlap Volume = 2.66410E-04 ( 14.7%)
Copy No. 5:
Number of Mapped Nodes = 691510 ( 8.5%)
Bounding Box Overlap Volume = 2.85923E-04 ( 15.8%)
Copy No. 6:
Number of Mapped Nodes = 691510 ( 8.5%)
Bounding Box Overlap Volume = 3.04286E-04 ( 16.8%)
Copy No. 7:
Number of Mapped Nodes = 691510 ( 8.5%)
Bounding Box Overlap Volume = 3.21365E-04 ( 17.8%)
Copy No. 8:
Number of Mapped Nodes = 691510 ( 8.5%)
Bounding Box Overlap Volume = 3.37036E-04 ( 18.7%)
Copy No. 9:
Number of Mapped Nodes = 691510 ( 8.5%)
Bounding Box Overlap Volume = 3.51186E-04 ( 19.4%)
Copy No. 10:
Number of Mapped Nodes = 691510 ( 8.5%)
Bounding Box Overlap Volume = 3.63711E-04 ( 20.1%)
Copy No. 11:
Number of Mapped Nodes = 691510 ( 8.5%)
Bounding Box Overlap Volume = 3.74517E-04 ( 20.7%)
Copy No. 12:
Number of Mapped Nodes = 691510 ( 8.5%)
Bounding Box Overlap Volume = 3.83525E-04 ( 21.2%)

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ****** Notice ****** |
| |
| The solution field on the target domain will be interpolated from |
| multiple source domains. Only variables from the primary source |
| domain "DLPT" will be interpolated. |
| The interpolator will neglect solution variables from other source |
| domains unless they can also be found in the primary one. |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
Setting Up Unmapped Nodes:
Number of Unmapped Nodes = 816 ( 0.0%)



Number of mapped nodes … 100/12 results in 8,5%, which I think I understand.
But what does Bounding Box Overlap Volume mean? It increases with every mapping step? Actually there should be no overlap between the interpolation objects.

Also at the end “Number of Unmapped Nodes” I don’t understand what that means either.

Thanks in advance,

Chris
ckm2 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 9, 2022, 18:55
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,728
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
You would probably be better advised to look at the result of the interpolation and check the result is OK.

Do this by saving a result file at time step = 0. This will include the result of the interpolation, so you can check that the result it gives you is OK.
ckm2 likes this.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
interpolation mapping, interpretation, out-file


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[OpenFOAM] Annoying issue of automatic "Rescale to Data Range " with paraFoam/paraview 3.12 keepfit ParaView 60 September 18, 2013 03:23
[swak4Foam] build problem swak4Foam OF 2.2.0 mcathela OpenFOAM Community Contributions 14 April 23, 2013 13:59
friction forces icoFoam ofslcm OpenFOAM 3 April 7, 2012 10:57
"parabolicVelocity" in OpenFoam 2.1.0 ? sawyer86 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 21 February 7, 2012 11:44
ParaView Compilation jakaranda OpenFOAM Installation 3 October 27, 2008 11:46


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:56.