|
[Sponsors] |
Specified Blend factor =1 Vs Central Difference |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 1, 2008, 17:31 |
Specified Blend factor =1 Vs Central Difference
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
From the CFX-doucment (Theory guide Release 11.0) page 289, the 'Specified blend factor =1' and the 'Central Difference' schemes for the advection term seem to be second-order-accurate. I am wondering what level of improvement should I expect to see in my results if I change one over the other?
Could some one help me getting the answer please? I am doing LES simulation and I know that the 'central difference' is recommended. But I am still interested in knowing the difference if I use 'specified blend factor=1' scheme. Thanks, Kushagra |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
central difference approximation | Hermano | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 5, 2011 17:23 |
First order in time and Central Difference Convergence problem | RameshK | Main CFD Forum | 7 | July 17, 2010 14:13 |
central difference method | sudhir | FLUENT | 6 | May 6, 2008 09:17 |
Central DIfference | Glen | Main CFD Forum | 9 | May 27, 2005 02:06 |
Central Difference vs Upwind Defference | S. Balasubramanyam | Main CFD Forum | 5 | January 16, 2002 01:58 |