CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > CONVERGE

Difference in methods specifying wall heat transfer

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   November 8, 2022, 18:11
Default Difference in methods specifying wall heat transfer
  #1
New Member
 
Arun Varma
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
arunravv is on a distinguished road
Hello, I am running an IC engine simulation where initially I specified "Global" heat model in the boundary.in file. I understand that in this case the heat transfer model will be considered from the turbulence.in file and there the default model is the O'Rourke and Amsden model. For the same case, I tried specifying O'Rourke and Amsden model in the boundary.in file itself and I see that there is a significant change in the results with this. Is there any reason why this is so, because the same model, applied in two different ways, should not give such a large difference in results.
arunravv is offline   Reply With Quote

 

Tags
heat model, ic engines


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[snappyHexMesh] How to draw a 3D-Drawing for Meshing Kahnbein.Kai OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 4 June 15, 2021 12:16
How to set heat transfer coefficient and wall temperature jpina FLUENT 1 March 21, 2016 08:47
Thin Wall Heat Transfer BC for rhoSimpleFoam swahono OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 October 4, 2013 11:49
Heat Flux at wall in a conjugate heat transfer problem Chander CFX 2 July 9, 2011 22:22
WALL HEAT TRANSFER COEF...AGAIN Carl CFX 2 July 8, 2005 01:35


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:32.