CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > FLOW-3D

Air entrainment model setup for spillway

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   November 10, 2016, 11:33
Default Air entrainment model setup for spillway
  #1
New Member
 
Olav
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Norway
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9
oajor is on a distinguished road
Hi!

I want to model a spillway weir with a vertical shaft and a tunnel system directly downstream. I expect including the air entrainment model in Flow-3D will cause an earlier backwater effect than without the model. My question is how to set up the parameters of the air entrainment model in Flow-3D for best possible results with no calibration data?!

In the basic air entrainment exercise (given by Flow Science) the following parameters are used (SI-units):
-Air entrainment rate coefficient = 0,5
-Surface tension coefficient = 0,073 N/m (water 20 degrees C)
-Drag coefficient = 0,95 (for buoyant spheres)
-Average particle radius = 0,0005 m (typical 0,5 mm - 2 mm)
-Richardson-Zaki coefficient multiplier = 1
-Viscosity of two-phase mix = 0,001 Ns/m^2 (assumed to be viscosity of continuous phase - water)
- Viscosity of water (phase 1) = 0,001 Ns/m^2
- Viscosity of air (phase 2) = 0,001 Ns/m^2 (assumed bubbles always separated by fluid film)
- Density of liquid = 1000 kg/m^3
- Volume fraction of air at inversion point = 1 (assumed bubbles always separated by fluid film for smaller volume fractions)
- Allow gas to escape at free surface = Yes
- Density of air = 1,2 kg/m^3

Does these parameters give reasonable results? Any better suggestions? I find it a bit weird to set the viscosity of air and the two phase mix to the one of water. I also wonder if there is any validation data to help me choose the air entrainment coefficient and or the drag coefficient?

I've also heard that the air entrainment model is really cell size sensitive. Any advice on setting the cell size for air entrainment (rule of thumb)? Will a cell size reduction study give better results (or convergence at all?)?

Is there any gain in also activating the adiabatic bubble model?

Any replies are welcome.
oajor is offline   Reply With Quote

 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wrong flow in ratating domain problem Sanyo CFX 17 August 15, 2015 06:20
Radiation interface hinca CFX 15 January 26, 2014 17:11
multiphase model, water in air? bugra Main CFD Forum 10 January 2, 2010 13:09
Re:Air Entrainment Model atulverma FLOW-3D 0 May 31, 2009 05:44
Kinetic air props model - conductivity HALF? Chris Bailey FLUENT 1 March 7, 2006 10:38


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14.