|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Wang
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
hello,everyone. I was simulating the flowfield of supersonic crossflow and normal sonic jet. The configuration was a 2d plate,
By using 1st scheme of flow in FLUENT, I can get the convergent solution. however, when the 2nd SOU scheme was applied, the calculation always unstable. Please give some advise, thank you very much. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Have you tried to lower the under-relaxation factors?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
Wang
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
yes, I have lowered under-relaxation factors from the default value(0.8) to 0.5, it failed still.
the boundary condition: crossflow: pressure inlet(supersonic) p0=2.4e5 Pa, T0=309K, M=3.5 jet: pressure inlet(sonic): p0=3.8e5 Pa, T0=293K, upper boundary: farfield pressure: M=3.5, T=86.5K out: pressure outlet: p=3145 Pa. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Just decrease the under-relaxation factors more ..... I had problems with under-relaxation of 1/3 or less of default values
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
New Member
Wang
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
I tried the value of under-relaxatioin factors of 0.1, it didn't work. I observed the field, when I turned 1st scheme to 2nd scheme, after several iteration, there was high temperatrue region right behind the mach disc of jet plume.
I think it was the source of disconvergence. But I don't konw how to deal with this problem |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
okay .... have you checked the mesh in this region?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
New Member
Wang
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
yes, mesh is very simple, it is H-type, I think the problem should not lie in mesh.
Now I am trying calculating with pressure-based solver instead of density-based solver. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Krishna
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
You should use density based solver for compressible flows. Have you tried decreasing the courants number?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|