|
[Sponsors] |
April 9, 2013, 02:02 |
VOF necessary mesh and timestep
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello, dear community of cfd-online!
Since VOF model is of much computational cost, there are 2 important issues: How fine domain should be meshed and what timestep should be used. If we have a 2D case of straight channel and to describe cross-section we use say 20 cells in the core and 6 cells per boundary layer to solve homogeneous flow. We want to solve a flow with gas and liquid phases, which volume fraction is 10%. Does it mean that for same accuracy we have to use 10x more cels to describe cross section? If we have a comparatively large timestep which results in Courant number equal to 30 and each timestep converges, is it still a good solution? What timesteps and Courant numbers could be applied to get a relevant solution with not much time spent on calculation? Thank you in advance for your answers! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
timestep and mesh size vs sensor sensitivity in experimental data | mbn1454 | STAR-CCM+ | 1 | November 19, 2011 07:49 |
Converting Starccm+ mesh | Ladnam | OpenFOAM | 0 | September 14, 2011 06:30 |
Timestep with mesh deformation | rbarrett | CFX | 4 | July 21, 2011 19:25 |
Convergence moving mesh | lr103476 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 30 | November 19, 2007 14:09 |
Timestep with different size of mesh | Liu | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 6, 2004 04:04 |