|
[Sponsors] |
June 3, 2013, 03:47 |
porous media in FLUENT
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi everybody,
I'm simulating flow through porous media and it works well with FLUENT. However, I have a question concerning the theory behind the flow: Basically, two different formulations can be used, one is denominated the "superficial velocity formulation" and the other one is the "physical velocity formulation". In the superficial velocity formulation, a sink term is added the usual momentum equation, S = mu/alpha * v (in my model I neglect the inertia resistance) mu is the dynamic viscosity, v the velocity and alpha denotes the permeability. However, the solution changes (as it should) if I use different values for the porosity gamma. I now wonder where the porosity enters the model equations within the superficial velocity formulation? As far as I know, the permeability does not depend on the porosity, however, in the ANSYS FLUENT 12.0 Users-Guide - 7.2.3, I find the following statement: " Both K and C2 are functions of (1-gamma). " What kind of relation is that and how is it theoretically justified? Thank you for any piece of advice, Natalie |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Porous Media Simulation with CFX/Fluent | Ghasem | ANSYS | 1 | May 14, 2013 09:07 |
relative velocity resistance formulation, porous media | arminheidari | FLUENT | 0 | January 7, 2013 04:02 |
compressible flow through porous media | Chirag2302 | FLUENT | 0 | March 2, 2012 23:13 |
Discrete phase model in porous media | Pradeep | FLUENT | 0 | February 3, 2006 16:30 |
porous media divergence | Phil | FLUENT | 0 | March 13, 2002 06:03 |