|
[Sponsors] |
Application of wall treatment models versus near-wall-approach |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 30, 2016, 11:06 |
Application of wall treatment models versus near-wall-approach
|
#1 |
New Member
Timur
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 10 |
Dear all,
I am simulating a slurry flow in a pipe (3D case) with a diameter of 3,2 cm, velocity of 1 m/s. Based on the estimation of the first layer thickness at y+=1, I have to have something about 1,6e-5 m. When I do meshing with sweep method and inflation layers, I get very high skewness as well as high aspect ratio in the boundary layer region which is obvious. I am not sure what can I do with this problem. My questions are: 1) Can I simulate the flow even with high skewness but with "correct' first layer thickness? 2) Can I use Enhaced wall treatment in this cases and do not make the boundary layers so thin? 3) Will the EWT work properly if my boundary layers are not very fined? Thank you very much in advanced for your replies. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Setting the height of the stream in the free channel | kevinmccartin | CFX | 12 | October 13, 2022 21:43 |
Is Playstation 3 cluster suitable for CFD work | hsieh | OpenFOAM | 9 | August 16, 2015 14:53 |
Error finding variable "THERMX" | sunilpatil | CFX | 8 | April 26, 2013 07:00 |
Wall treatment mesh refinement in k-omega SST model | Jorg | FLUENT | 0 | February 27, 2013 11:32 |
Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 05:12 |