 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
Implicit Time Stepping: First or Second Order? |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 24, 2017, 05:57
|
Implicit Time Stepping: First or Second Order?
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 10  |
Hi all,
I was curious if somebody with more experience on the numerical side of things could enlighten me about the choice of time stepping schemes. I understand that second order will be more accurate but I how important is it when timesteps are already in the order of 10e-5 10e-6? thanks |
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| fluent, time stepping |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AMI speed performance | danny123 | OpenFOAM | 21 | October 24, 2020 04:13 |
| [solidMechanics] solidMechanics gear contact in rotation | nlc | OpenFOAM CC Toolkits for Fluid-Structure Interaction | 3 | January 11, 2015 06:41 |
| number of iterations per time step | chouki | FLUENT | 1 | August 13, 2013 00:11 |
| Could anybody help me see this error and give help | liugx212 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | January 4, 2006 18:07 |
| time stepping in implicit way | varghese | FLUENT | 4 | February 28, 2003 03:34 |
4Likes
Threaded Mode
