|
[Sponsors] |
Why natural convection is difficult to converged? |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
wanghuo
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
Hello friends!
Why it's difficult to converged when we use the fluent to simulation,could you recomend some paper,books or idea about this to me ?Thank you very much! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,683
Rep Power: 66 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's difficult because it's highly non-linear: buoyancy/density depends on temperature, temperature depends on natural convection, natural convection depends on.... density again. Using boussinesq model may help as well a having a very good initial guess. Reducing under-relaxation factors on density and temperature may help stabilize it if you are having divergence problems.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
wanghuo
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Flavio
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Brescia, Italy
Posts: 181
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Hello hotboy,
I worked on natural convection in closed domain: I had the same difficulties as yours and I found useful some solver set up like Density-based solver (Iterations with Solution Steering) or Pressure-based-coupled with pseudo-transient. They are heavier in terms of memory, but they even require less iterations to converge than segregated solvers! Best Regards
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
wanghuo
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Flavio
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Brescia, Italy
Posts: 181
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Unfortunately transient simulation would be the best way because the system is intrinsically unsteady. I was able to use those solvers with steady simulation, they took some time to tune up the numerical parameters (CFL, etc...), but they worked well.
If you will have any question about the specific solver I may help you. Good Luck! Best regards
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
New Member
Charlie Howard
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
Hi,
I'm also having problems trying to get a natural convection problem to converge. Could you please have a look at my case? http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/flu...tml#post539428 Regards Chuck |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
nm
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 100
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Here are some quick pointers:
1. Run first with Bosinuesq(spell correct :/) and get an initial guess. Then switch to compressible model. 2. If it's a high Rayleigh number flow, change gravity to .098 or something to get an intermediate solution. did you calculate the timescales of the flow? also what turbulence model are you using? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
wanghuo
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Yuehan
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Hi,
Do you mean coupled solve with pseudo transient enabled can be used to solve steady buoyancy-driven flows? Does it perform better than SIMPLE? Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thermophysical properties for natural convection | Ciefdi | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | November 7, 2013 11:44 |
Natural Convection - Problem in achieving converged solution | howhs | FLUENT | 2 | August 28, 2013 10:51 |
natural convection problem with radiation | jorien | CFX | 0 | October 14, 2011 09:26 |
Coupled vs Seg - Natural vs. Forced Convection | Alex | Siemens | 5 | December 12, 2007 04:58 |
Difficult to Converge in Natural Convection | Saturn | CFX | 1 | October 15, 2006 18:01 |