|
[Sponsors] |
DPM group injection of different size of CaCO3. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 14, 2018, 22:48 |
DPM group injection of different size of CaCO3.
|
#1 |
New Member
Thum Guan Wei
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 8 |
Good day, everyone. I am alvin, currently i working on using DPM method to inject calcium carbonate particle from the inlet along the tube with water-liquid fluid (both also using 1.5m/s). My purpose is need to identify the size of particle(2μm,5μm,10μm,20μm,100μm)will affect the number of incomplete particles. The incomplete particle means the particle going to settle down at bottom of the pipe and turbulent dispersion of continuous phase has negligible effect on those particles. Below there is the result based on the paper however when i run the simulation with the method stated by the author, i am not able to obtain similar result. But the result i obtained is zero incomplete particle and all the particle escape from outlet.
Therefore, i wanna know will it be the mesh problem for inlet. Here got two pic, one is the picture for the paper another one is my meshing. I am using sweep mesh by inflating the boundaries. Or could it be the under relaxation factor since the author had mention using lower under relaxation factor but the author didnt stated the exact value for those factor. Appreciate to everyone who read the message and hope can get some help from all of you. May you all be well and happy, alvin. Result.png mesh from thesis.png mesh from alvin.jpg |
|
March 15, 2018, 02:02 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Hello Thum,
I am not an expert in this topic but I think you should increase Max. Number of steps under Tracking parameters, in order to track as much as particles you can..And so you can avoid particles escaping from outlet.. I guess there is no problem in mesh. Good luck :-) |
|
March 15, 2018, 03:11 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Thum Guan Wei
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 8 |
Good day Kummi and Appreciate for your help.
In the thesis paper i refer had mentioned that the Max. Number of steps is set in default means 500 only. I just curious about how the boundary condition of the wall will affect the calculation of ansys cause i set the wall in reflect with 0 tangent and 0 polynomial. May you be well and happy, alvin |
|
March 16, 2018, 01:42 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
|
Hello Thum,
Default number of steps is 500, however you can increase it. DPM wall boundary conditions will affect the solution in general. So choose appropriate boundary condition at the wall. https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Flu...ug/node852.htm Best regards |
|
March 16, 2018, 04:21 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Thum Guan Wei
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
I have another curious, normally the size of particle will influence the Ansys to track it. For example, 100μm is more difficult than 2μm when ansys want to track it. This is because when i do the simulation with 2μm always show higher number incomplete particles compare to 100μm. But the thesis i refer is mention that 100μm will have higher incomplete particles.(Can refer to my first post). May you be well and happy, alvin. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Other] dynamicTopoFVMesh and pointDisplacement | RandomUser | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | April 26, 2018 07:30 |
injection problem | Mark New | FLUENT | 0 | August 4, 2013 01:30 |
Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue | Miguel Baritto | CFX | 4 | August 31, 2006 12:02 |
about group injection of DPM model | zwdi | FLUENT | 5 | April 12, 2004 19:31 |
DPM Injection Parameters | Hendawi | FLUENT | 0 | June 13, 2002 09:41 |