CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

DPM group injection of different size of CaCO3.

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Kummi

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 14, 2018, 22:48
Smile DPM group injection of different size of CaCO3.
  #1
New Member
 
Thum Guan Wei
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 8
alvinthum is on a distinguished road
Good day, everyone. I am alvin, currently i working on using DPM method to inject calcium carbonate particle from the inlet along the tube with water-liquid fluid (both also using 1.5m/s). My purpose is need to identify the size of particle(2μm,5μm,10μm,20μm,100μm)will affect the number of incomplete particles. The incomplete particle means the particle going to settle down at bottom of the pipe and turbulent dispersion of continuous phase has negligible effect on those particles. Below there is the result based on the paper however when i run the simulation with the method stated by the author, i am not able to obtain similar result. But the result i obtained is zero incomplete particle and all the particle escape from outlet.

Therefore, i wanna know will it be the mesh problem for inlet. Here got two pic, one is the picture for the paper another one is my meshing. I am using sweep mesh by inflating the boundaries.

Or could it be the under relaxation factor since the author had mention using lower under relaxation factor but the author didnt stated the exact value for those factor.

Appreciate to everyone who read the message and hope can get some help from all of you.

May you all be well and happy, alvin.

Result.png

mesh from thesis.png

mesh from alvin.jpg
alvinthum is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 15, 2018, 02:02
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Kumaresh
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 349
Rep Power: 11
Kummi is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to Kummi
Hello Thum,
I am not an expert in this topic but I think you should increase Max. Number of steps under Tracking parameters, in order to track as much as particles you can..And so you can avoid particles escaping from outlet..
I guess there is no problem in mesh.

Good luck :-)
alvinthum likes this.
Kummi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 15, 2018, 03:11
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Thum Guan Wei
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 8
alvinthum is on a distinguished road
Good day Kummi and Appreciate for your help.

In the thesis paper i refer had mentioned that the Max. Number of steps is set in default means 500 only. I just curious about how the boundary condition of the wall will affect the calculation of ansys cause i set the wall in reflect with 0 tangent and 0 polynomial.

May you be well and happy, alvin
alvinthum is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 16, 2018, 01:42
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Kumaresh
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 349
Rep Power: 11
Kummi is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to Kummi
Hello Thum,
Default number of steps is 500, however you can increase it. DPM wall boundary conditions will affect the solution in general. So choose appropriate boundary condition at the wall.

https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Flu...ug/node852.htm

Best regards
Kummi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 16, 2018, 04:21
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Thum Guan Wei
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 8
alvinthum is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kummi View Post
Hello Thum,
Default number of steps is 500, however you can increase it. DPM wall boundary conditions will affect the solution in general. So choose appropriate boundary condition at the wall.

https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Flu...ug/node852.htm

Best regards
Noted and thanks you, Kummi. I will work with it.

I have another curious, normally the size of particle will influence the Ansys to track it. For example, 100μm is more difficult than 2μm when ansys want to track it. This is because when i do the simulation with 2μm always show higher number incomplete particles compare to 100μm. But the thesis i refer is mention that 100μm will have higher incomplete particles.(Can refer to my first post).

May you be well and happy, alvin.
alvinthum is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Other] dynamicTopoFVMesh and pointDisplacement RandomUser OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 6 April 26, 2018 07:30
injection problem Mark New FLUENT 0 August 4, 2013 01:30
Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue Miguel Baritto CFX 4 August 31, 2006 12:02
about group injection of DPM model zwdi FLUENT 5 April 12, 2004 19:31
DPM Injection Parameters Hendawi FLUENT 0 June 13, 2002 09:41


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:05.