CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Shifting from SIMPLE 2nd order to COUPLED pseudo-transient bumps comptn. time hugely

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   April 12, 2019, 17:44
Exclamation Shifting from SIMPLE 2nd order to COUPLED pseudo-transient bumps comptn. time hugely
  #1
New Member
 
Sri Harsha Maddila
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 8
harsha2398 is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am running a cold-flow simulation of a combustion chamber in a turbine for my project and basically, I move from SIMPLE first-order schemes (250 it.) to second order upwind (500 it.) and finally, COUPLED pseudo-transient (2000+ it.) to arrive at the solution. While the SIMPLE schemes' iterations take around 2 hours to complete, the pseudo-transient COUPLED (or just COUPLED for that matter) iterations - estimated according to FLUENT in the console - take 400+ hours and keep increasing iteration after iteration!!

Here's a picture of the mesh cross-section: https://1drv.ms/u/s!As6k8_h0tQpljv5xqp7UyEwktHg3JQ

The mesh has 3,314,331 polyhedral cells.
Operating conditions: 4% pressure drop from the plenum (left) to the outlet (right, the exit of the combustion chamber)
I am running this case on my Inspiron 5558 in parallel (Solver: 4 processes) (16GB RAM, dual-core, i7 Ultrabook processor).

Could anyone tell me why this is happening? Is this merely a lack of computational resources? What else could be done to achieve convergence?

P.S: A layman's explanation as to what a timescale factor is and what it means would be much appreciated as well (I used 0.1 in this simulation)
harsha2398 is offline   Reply With Quote

 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[General] Extracting ParaView Data into Python Arrays Jeffzda ParaView 30 November 6, 2023 21:00
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end xiuying OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 August 27, 2013 15:33
IcoFoam parallel woes msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 July 22, 2007 02:58
Could anybody help me see this error and give help liugx212 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 January 4, 2006 18:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:43.