|
[Sponsors] |
March 30, 2021, 15:49 |
SIMPLE and PISO doubts in Fluent
|
#1 |
Member
Luca
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Italy
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 5 |
Hi guys! I have two different questions regarding how Fluents deals with PISO and SIMPLE algorithms:
1 - It seems that Fluent allows the user to set up a pressure-based transient problem implementing the PISO algorithm and contemporary defining under-relaxation factors... Does it make sense? I was pretty convinced that under-relaxation are related to SIMPLE or PIMPLE schemes... 2 - I saw also that for Fluent it's possible to perform transient analysis with SIMPLE algorithm, another time, does it make any sense? I always considered SIMPLE for steady state problems... Could you guys correct me if I am wrong? I'm trying to understand if my CFD knowledge needs some improvements or simply Fluent allows the user to set up also non feasible settings ahah! Thank you! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Incompressible RANS: SIMPLE and PISO, temporal discretization | direwolf | Main CFD Forum | 13 | March 15, 2021 14:45 |
Simple vs Piso | andreia_melo | FLUENT | 12 | November 28, 2018 10:17 |
SIMPLE vs. PISO | Kappa | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | October 17, 2016 08:08 |
SIMPLE and PISO | Aditya | Main CFD Forum | 5 | April 1, 2006 18:52 |
PISO vs. SIMPLE | benedikt flurl | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 14, 2005 06:54 |