|
[Sponsors] |
May 20, 2020, 19:01 |
Reference erosion rate _ oka model
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Jamal Foroozesh
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 162
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi dear friends
What is reference erosion rate ( oka model) formula in fluent ? Is below formula true? E90 = 1e-09 * rho_w * K (Hv ^ k1) |
|
May 21, 2020, 07:21 |
Refrence Erosion Rate
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
The generic formulation for reference erosion rate (from Oka's work) is
and is dependent on material pairs. Where did you get the relation you mentioned in your post?
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
May 21, 2020, 08:05 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Jamal Foroozesh
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 162
Rep Power: 13 |
Thanks for your reply
Is v inlet velocity? Is D particle diameter? I confused and I don't know how fluent calculate 0.000615 in below picture. Can you describe a little more specific for me? |
|
May 21, 2020, 16:41 |
Reference Values
|
#4 |
Senior Member
|
Fluent does not calculate reference erosion rate. User needs to provide it. The default values are just hard-coded values and most likely correspond to hitting on either Copper or Steel.
is impact velocity of the particle and D is its diameter.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
May 21, 2020, 17:43 |
|
#5 | |
Senior Member
Jamal Foroozesh
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 162
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
Unfortunately I couldn't describe my question well. A better question: I know below formulas correspond to Sio2 and Aluminium. How can I set reference erosion rate? |
||
May 26, 2020, 09:28 |
Reference Erosion Rate
|
#6 |
Senior Member
|
If you already know reference values, then just use those values in the formula. The formula that you have written is wrong. Look at my first post.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
May 28, 2020, 05:30 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Jamal Foroozesh
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 162
Rep Power: 13 |
||
June 14, 2020, 11:58 |
Question about the reference Erosion Rate
|
#8 | |
New Member
Tanglubo
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 5 |
Quote:
I spent a long time studying this Reference Erosion Rate,but I am still very confused. If the Hv is 1.8,how is the default value of 0.000615 calculated? I would like to know the detailed calculation formula and steps very much. I am looking forward to your help, thank you! |
||
June 14, 2020, 22:18 |
Question about the Up and the 0.000615
|
#9 | ||
New Member
Tanglubo
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 5 |
Quote:
Quote:
I cannot calculate the value of 0.000615 with the formula your first post and the default parameter (Hv=1.8Gpa) in Fluent. and the E90 is equal to 84.714(Hv)^-0.79 * [(V_p/V')^k_2]*[(D_p/D')^k_3] maybe is right((see Ref. 1, equation 43 or Ref. 2, equation 14 for details).) Can you describe a little more specific for me? Ref. 1: Numerical investigation of mass loading effects on elbow erosion http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...32591015004763 Ref. 2: Mitigating elbow erosion with a vortex chamber http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...32591015301200 |
|||
November 26, 2023, 02:28 |
|
#10 | |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 2 |
Quote:
Did you understand through what formula the software reached the number 0.000615 for reference erosion!??? Thank you in advance Ahmad Veis |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about adaptive timestepping | Guille1811 | CFX | 25 | November 12, 2017 17:38 |
Centrifugal fan-reverse flow in outlet lesds to a mass in flow field | xiexing | CFX | 3 | March 29, 2017 10:00 |
Ansys CFX problem: unexpected very high temperatures in premix laminar combustion | faizan_habib7 | CFX | 4 | February 1, 2016 17:00 |
Compression stoke is giving higher pressure than calculated | nickjuana | CFX | 62 | May 19, 2015 13:32 |
Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 03:32 |