|
[Sponsors] |
Will UDF coding SOURCE TERM cancel out existing 1 |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 11, 2002, 22:09 |
Will UDF coding SOURCE TERM cancel out existing 1
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm very new at UDF, I wanna code SOURCE TERM, but I'm wondering when I introduce the UDF in Fluent, does it cancel out the other source terms which r already exist in Fluent, like body force etc. or do I need to code all together? Very clear, I'll introduce universal gravitational forces, adhesive force, van der waals forces etc. do I need to code separately for each term? or adding them all together in one code?
Help me, thanksalot ahead. Alamgir |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[swak4Foam] swak4foam building problem | GGerber | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 54 | April 24, 2015 16:02 |
DxFoam reader update | hjasak | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 69 | April 24, 2008 01:24 |
PDE in udf for defining momentum source term | shekhar | FLUENT | 0 | April 12, 2004 01:43 |
a question about UDF for source term | winnie | FLUENT | 1 | May 2, 2003 09:11 |
UDFs for Scalar Eqn - Fluid/Solid HT | Greg Perkins | FLUENT | 0 | October 11, 2000 03:43 |