|
[Sponsors] |
On grid independent solution for pulsatile flow |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 7, 2005, 14:01 |
On grid independent solution for pulsatile flow
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all,
I am modelling a 2d pulsatile flow in a conical tube for an undergraduate project. This tube is about 15 cm long with a radius varying between 6.5 mm and 12.5 mm. I use a velocity inlet and a pressure outlet. I am trying to acheive an grid independent solution. To do so, I compare a grid having 200 000 cells vs. one having 800 000 cells. I have set-up monitors for various quantities including the area-weighted velocity magnitude of points lying on the centerline (symmetry axis) of the tube. When comparing the 2 cases I get satisfying results. My problem is when monitoring the integral of wall shear stress on the wall of the tube. I get vary different values (30% error) when taking the cycle time-average. My question is does this mean that my grid is not fine enough? Can someone give an order of magnitude as to how many cells I should be using to obtain a grid-independent solution? From what I had read I tought 200 000 cells would be more than enough for a laminar case... Any comments would be much appreciated. Thanking you in advance for your time. David |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
initialize flow field with steady state solution | holg | FLUENT | 0 | July 13, 2009 17:10 |
Mesh independent solution | CFX Begineer | CFX | 0 | October 27, 2002 10:54 |
Combustion Convergence problems | Art Stretton | Phoenics | 5 | April 2, 2002 05:59 |
Discussion about Mesh independant solution | Seb | Main CFD Forum | 13 | May 22, 2001 13:37 |
Grid Independent Solution | Hesham M. Aly | FLUENT | 2 | October 5, 2000 08:24 |