|
[Sponsors] |
June 21, 2018, 06:29 |
4x Xeon Gold CPU - cores utilization problem
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 8 |
Hello everyone,
Our company has bought a new server with 4x Xeon Gold 6154 CPUs (18 cores, 36 threads each CPU) for Ansys Fluent calculations. We have enough HPC pack licenses for up to 128 cores calculations, but I cannot use all of the core on the new server. When I start Fluent 18.1 with parallel settings of 72 cores (intel MPI), Fluent detects only 36 cores, even though there are 72 physical cores available according to Task Manager (hyperthreading is OFF at BIOS). Operating system is Win Server 2012R2. Does anybody know how to solve that kind of problem? Is there any additional settings for using more than 36 cores? I have never used more than 32 cores before buying this server. Thank you in advance! > report/system/sys-stats --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | CPU | System Mem (GB) Hostname | Sock x Core Clock (MHz) Load (%) | Total Available --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WS96 | 1 x 36 2993 0.589446 | 382.667 374.943 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total | 36 - - | 382.667 374.943 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Had enough of CFD Post - can Tecplot parallel compute over many cores (CPU and GPU)? | JuPa | Tecplot | 3 | June 26, 2022 22:59 |
stop when I run in parallel | Nolwenn | OpenFOAM | 36 | March 21, 2021 04:56 |
[Other] Comparison of OpenFOAM on i7, Xeon@32 cores, Xeon Phi Knights Landing, Tesla K20m | ma-tri-x | OpenFOAM Installation | 6 | March 10, 2018 09:00 |
high CPU load with no computation going on & Pressure coefficient output problem | spetsnaz26 | FLUENT | 0 | September 30, 2011 05:25 |
UDF problem in 2 CPU machine | David | FLUENT | 2 | April 18, 2004 09:02 |