|
[Sponsors] |
April 12, 2023, 11:13 |
New DDR5 workstation recommendations
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello all.
We're going to build a few new workstations for the lab(~$10K budget in total). We have HPC resources so we need some fast local resources as supplement. I'm choosing between these options: 1. Intel 13th Gen + 2-ch DDR5 (OC 7200+) 2. AMD Zen 4 + 2-ch DDR5 (OC 6400) 3. Intel Xeon W-2400 + 4-ch DDR5-4800 4. Intel Xeon W-3400 + 8-ch DDR5-4800 (Overkill?) 5. AMD TR Pro/EYPC + 8-ch DDR4-3200 6. Wait for AMD DDR5 HEDT For option 1/2 we should be able to build 4 desktops and for option 3/5 we can build 2 workstations. I think at this point DDR5 is cheap enough so there's no reason not to go for the new platform. Any recommendations? |
|
April 12, 2023, 15:33 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Will Kernkamp
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 341
Rep Power: 12 |
Do you have two or four potential users?
|
|
April 12, 2023, 18:26 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 9 |
||
April 13, 2023, 10:34 |
|
#4 |
Member
Matt
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 15 |
What are you doing with these workstations? CFD/FEA pre-post? CAD? Video rendering?
If you aren't running actual simulations on these machines, then you probably mostly need single-threaded performance, so Intel Raptor Lake is your best bet. You probably need at least 64GB of RAM (if not 128GB). I wouldn't pay for high speed RAM for these types of applications; decent XMP DDR5-6000ish CL30 kits would do the job and be more stable than trying to overlock to 7200 MT/s. CAD and CFD post both benefit from a good workstation video card; the 6GB A2000 is a great option (they can be had pretty cheap in bulk packaging if you look around). The workstation CPU options (W2400/3400 and TR Pro) mostly offer multi-threaded performance and memory bandwidth, neither of which you likely have any use for. UNLESS you need 256+ GB of RAM and/or ECC, then you need to go with a workstation CPU, but that'll blow up your budget in a hurry. |
|
April 13, 2023, 11:31 |
|
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
We'll get 128GB, like our current DDR4 computers. We bought a lot of GTX1050 a few years ago and never had any problem doing post processing. I wonder what type of benefit can I get from these cards. |
||
April 13, 2023, 11:48 |
|
#6 |
Member
Matt
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 15 |
Well, if they are only used for backup/debugging simulations, I wouldn't spend 2X+ more for workstation CPUs. And definitely don't go nuts on memory speed; 4x32GB DDR5 will downclock significantly on desktop motherboards, so you won't be able to take advantage of fast memory anyway. 4x32 GB UDIMM kits at 4800 MT/S exist, but are expensive, and likely won't even boot at 4800 MT/s (typically they have to be downclocked to 4000 MT/s). It's almost worth getting a W2465x just to avoid all the time you'll waste trying to debug memory issues on a desktop board w/ 4x32GB DDR5 DIMMS; horror stories abound of folks trying to use 128 GB of DDR5 on desktop motherboards, so caveat emptor.
The A2000 is about 4x faster than the 1050Ti, and has the same power draw (and doesn't even need an external power connector). It's equivalent to a 3050Ti, and can be found for a similar price as the 3050Ti (but you get the workstation drivers, which can be VERY important for CAD, dunno about ANSYS). Just make sure you get cards with full-width brackets (some only come with low-profile brackets). |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Workstation for OpenFOAM recommendations | sarah_m | Hardware | 4 | January 26, 2023 10:45 |
Single CPU recommendations for OpenFOAM workstation | trans(sonic)_pride | Hardware | 2 | November 11, 2022 11:11 |
Looking for recommendations for a fast pre-post CFD workstation | psaracoglu | Hardware | 5 | September 24, 2020 22:46 |
Another Workstation spec questions.... | jeanhyuk | Hardware | 4 | July 10, 2018 05:37 |
Workstation recommendations | Charles Crosby | Main CFD Forum | 5 | June 21, 2000 04:43 |