|
[Sponsors] |
May 29, 2006, 10:02 |
v2f models in CFD-Wiki
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
We have been working on improving the turbulence modeling section in CFD-Wiki this month. One of the things that we still lack is a decent description of the v2f models.
I'm not that familar with the v2f family of models. Is there anyone who can help me? Which variants of the model are there? What are their merits and problems? Which one is most popular? References? What should you think about when implementing the v2f models? Perhaps someone even has a LaTeX report which we could cut-and-paste directly into CFD-Wiki to get something to start from? As it is now the v2f section in CFD-Wiki only contains a reference. You can post reponses here or, even better, edit the v2f section in CFD-Wiki directly (you have to register as a CFD-Wiki user first). |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFD and ocean models | caldeira | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 10, 2003 04:49 |
What is the Better Way to Do CFD? | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 54 | April 23, 2001 08:10 |
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, 22-26 July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 16 | October 2, 2000 09:15 |
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 12, 1999 23:27 |
public CFD Code development | Heinz Wilkening | Main CFD Forum | 38 | March 5, 1999 11:44 |