|
[Sponsors] |
Experimental data validation and/or grid independence |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 27, 2014, 16:13 |
Experimental data validation and/or grid independence
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 15 |
Dear all,
I have a very fundamental question. I have some experimental data that I would like to validate my CFD results against. Should I test my CFD solution for grid independence? Or would an adequate comparison with the experimental data be sufficient enough to call the CFD solution (with a grid not tested for independence) a representation of what's happening within the system? In other words, should only a grid independent solution used for validation against experimental data? Or can a solution that provides adequate agreement with experimental data be deemed as final (without doing any grid independce studies)? I would appreciate your response. Thank you. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tecplot. add experimental data into a mesh | Alejandro | FLUENT | 0 | December 10, 2008 07:08 |
How to update polyPatchbs localPoints | liu | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | December 30, 2005 17:27 |
experimental data for droplet evaporation | suranga | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 14, 2005 09:53 |
CFD Validation Data | Alan Stewart | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 9, 1998 06:53 |
Multiphase experimental data | James McLaren | Main CFD Forum | 1 | September 14, 1998 06:35 |