|
[Sponsors] |
February 14, 2008, 03:51 |
CFL condition for higher order schemes
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I read in an article that the CFL condition for higher order schemes can be very low, as the resolution is given by (h/p^d), where h is the grid spacing, p is the polynomial degree of reconstruction and d is the number of dimensions. One of the professor mentioned that it is advised to use multigrid techniques for improving the CFL condition. I am using unstructured higher order FVM. My question is, 1. Is it really required to do a multigrid for a transient problem when higher order schemes (3rd to 4th order) are used? 2. If I get a stable time marching with CFL=0.5 with third order RK and third order scheme, does it compromise the solution accuracy for a transient problem? 3. For unstructured higher order finite volume method, which is the best suitable way to do a multigrid? Thanks in advance for your help, Shyam |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFL Condition | Matt Umbel | Main CFD Forum | 19 | June 30, 2020 08:20 |
Is CFL condition irrelevant for incompressible flow? | violet | FLUENT | 0 | November 5, 2009 17:33 |
2nd order boundary condition for QUICK scheme | Jafarnia | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 25, 2004 09:03 |
Gradient Estimation for Higher Order Schemes | jianxia | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 6, 2000 19:40 |
LES - numerics | David Hunt | Main CFD Forum | 8 | May 23, 2000 02:08 |