|
[Sponsors] |
May 18, 2017, 00:17 |
Second-Moment Closure in 2D Flow
|
#1 |
New Member
Pawarit
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi,
I was wondering why specifically we require 4 additional transport equations for the Reynolds stresses in 2D flow?? (For the 3D case, it makes perfect sense to take all 6 Reynolds stress components). I understand that turbulence is a 3D phenomenon. Hence, for 2D simulations, we can allow a zero mean W (out of the page) with a fluctuating velocity w'. But then it raises the question: Why do we solve for (w'w')?? but not (u'w') or (v'w') then? Thank you very much everyone! |
|
Tags |
reynolds stress model, reynolds stress tensor |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass flow inlet and pressure outlet with target mass flow rate | Zigainer | FLUENT | 13 | October 26, 2018 05:58 |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 05:21 |
Flow meter Design | CD adapco Group Marketing | Siemens | 3 | June 21, 2011 08:33 |
transform navier-stokes eq. to euler-eq. | pxyz | Main CFD Forum | 37 | July 7, 2006 08:42 |
Plug Flow | Franck | Main CFD Forum | 3 | September 4, 2003 05:57 |