|
[Sponsors] |
2D-flow in a tube: Continuity and Navier-Stokes |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 9, 2017, 12:55 |
2D-flow in a tube: Continuity and Navier-Stokes
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi people,
I want to do some basic stuff with Python 2.7 an the finite differences method. Now I have the following case: - 2D-flow in a tube, steady state, not compressible - at the inlet there ist a constant velocity profile so () - the flow is developing into a convex profile I want to find out the length "L" of the tube, where the velocity profile isn't developing any more. The basic equation for continuity and Navier-Stokes are: An assumption is, that I say the velocity "v" is everywhere zero. So every term with "v" in the Navier-Stokes and Continuity equation is zero and I have to solve only the u-Momentum (as shown). In addition to this I say that is also zero. After this assumptions I have these equations left (Continuity and navier-stokes): If I look to my continuity equation and insert it into the navier-stokes, there is: So in my eyes it doesn't make sense ? It means: The velocity profile is not dependent on the fluid. So it doesn't matter, if there is water or air ? I don't think so.(?) I tried the case without inserting and I solved the equation in Python. It works and there are meaningful results. But I don't understand. Actually I have to insert the continuity into the Navier-stokes, isn't it ? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Steady Incompressible Navier Stokes | selim | CFX | 0 | October 24, 2007 07:52 |
continuity & navier stokes.... | Louise | FLUENT | 2 | March 2, 2007 10:57 |
ILU for Navier stokes problems | Raju | Main CFD Forum | 5 | July 29, 2006 14:15 |
Navier stokes compresible viscid flow fea, somebody can help? | Jose Choy | Main CFD Forum | 3 | October 24, 2003 02:28 |
help: I am trying to solve Navier Stokes compressible and viscid flow | Jose Choy | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 18, 2000 05:45 |