|
[Sponsors] |
Numerical Calculation More Stable with Higher CFL number? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 28, 2023, 18:59 |
Numerical Calculation More Stable with Higher CFL number?
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 4 |
Thus, I planned to use the Lax-Wendroff technique for numerical linear advection analysis. In terms of code, I believe my code works as planned. Nevertheless, it appears that my CFL=1 result is more stable than CFL = 0.5 when I run the code with different CFL values. Does it make sense? Or is there a mistake in my code?
|
|
November 29, 2023, 04:36 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,849
Rep Power: 73 |
Quote:
These are issues you should study in a CFD textbook. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
use the message in macro DEFINE_PROFILE with parallel processor | alireza_T | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 3 | May 11, 2022 03:08 |
[mesh manipulation] Mesh Refinement | Luiz Eduardo Bittencourt Sampaio (Sampaio) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 42 | January 8, 2017 13:55 |
SigFpe when running ANY application in parallel | Pj. | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | April 23, 2015 15:53 |
Unaligned accesses on IA64 | andre | OpenFOAM | 5 | June 23, 2008 11:37 |
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 05:15 |