|
[Sponsors] |
March 21, 2024, 17:10 |
CFL value
|
#1 |
New Member
Muna M.
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
I have made a first-order F.V. (upwind scheme) code for the shallow water system in 1 D. I have found that when I increase the value of CFL until 0.99, the resolution of the solution gets better special in the dam break problem and the method seems to be more than first-order method!!, my question is can cfL increase the accuracy of the method? or this is due to the solution evolving more rapidly, causing it to be artificially steep in the numerical solution.
|
|
March 21, 2024, 17:19 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,780
Rep Power: 71 |
Quote:
Not the accuracy order, but it can locally reduce the amount of numerical viscosity |
||
March 21, 2024, 17:35 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Muna M.
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
||
March 21, 2024, 17:49 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,780
Rep Power: 71 |
Quote:
Yes but the CFL is local, it depends on the velocity field and step size. Thus, you cannot suppose to have a uniform high value everywhere. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFL Adapt parameter | DLuo | SU2 | 7 | May 19, 2024 18:28 |
CFL RAMPING IN v 7.1.1 | pdp.aero | SU2 | 4 | May 26, 2021 12:46 |
Is CFL number (or Courant number) omnipotent? | Vignesh2508 | Main CFD Forum | 11 | February 28, 2019 12:56 |
Test Case CFL Number Issues with Software Update | JBCFD | SU2 | 3 | July 14, 2017 12:05 |
CFL ramp option | curky | SU2 | 1 | April 11, 2013 13:25 |