|
[Sponsors] |
October 23, 2000, 03:35 |
Differencing scheme for k-eps model
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
to calculate the convective fluxes of the momentum equations within the finite volume method one can often choose between upwind (1st order) or central (2nd order) or have a mix. So if I understood it right higher order means faster convergence to grid independent solution. (Right ?) Now my question. Has the choice of the differencing scheme the same influence concerning the k and eps equations ? Are there some numerical reasons why the differencing scheme in the turbulence equations is less important than in the momentum equations ? Cheers, Ron |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
about Subgrid-scale model | impecca | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | December 20, 2013 10:36 |
Turbulence Model and limitation to Reynolds number | qascapri | FLUENT | 0 | January 24, 2011 10:48 |
Low Reynolds k-epsilon model | YJZ | ANSYS | 1 | August 20, 2010 13:57 |
Kato-Launder model | sam | Main CFD Forum | 13 | September 21, 2006 10:15 |
MARS differencing scheme | Bart | Siemens | 4 | January 27, 2005 09:43 |