CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

TO Sebastien

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   January 11, 2001, 22:12
Default TO Sebastien
  #1
Zhu zhiwen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Sebastien,

continue to the last question, On SHEN's paper(J.of Comp.Phys.1998) the scheme which using the ( 3*u^(n+1)-4*n^n+u^(n-1))/2dt for the time derivative ,he said that the linear parabolic operator(Laplace operator)is approximated by a second-order backward scheme which appears to be more stable than the crank-nicholson scheme ,I donot know how he deal with the viscocity term,I didnot mean that the viscosity is varable,in generally,the central difference is used for the viscosity term.but on his paper,it seems not,

Thanks
  Reply With Quote

 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bug in SpalartAllmaras seb62 OpenFOAM Bugs 39 May 30, 2012 14:25
Turbulent boundary layer on a flat plate seb62 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 January 17, 2009 03:30
OpenFOAM vs Fluent for cylinder at Re%3d150 lr103476 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 40 December 18, 2008 09:09
Gcc for SGI IRIX 65 Ali (Ali) OpenFOAM Installation 58 April 24, 2008 05:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:19.