|
[Sponsors] |
January 11, 2001, 22:12 |
TO Sebastien
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Sebastien,
continue to the last question, On SHEN's paper(J.of Comp.Phys.1998) the scheme which using the ( 3*u^(n+1)-4*n^n+u^(n-1))/2dt for the time derivative ,he said that the linear parabolic operator(Laplace operator)is approximated by a second-order backward scheme which appears to be more stable than the crank-nicholson scheme ,I donot know how he deal with the viscocity term,I didnot mean that the viscosity is varable,in generally,the central difference is used for the viscosity term.but on his paper,it seems not, Thanks |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bug in SpalartAllmaras | seb62 | OpenFOAM Bugs | 39 | May 30, 2012 14:25 |
Turbulent boundary layer on a flat plate | seb62 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | January 17, 2009 03:30 |
OpenFOAM vs Fluent for cylinder at Re%3d150 | lr103476 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 40 | December 18, 2008 09:09 |
Gcc for SGI IRIX 65 | Ali (Ali) | OpenFOAM Installation | 58 | April 24, 2008 05:02 |