|
[Sponsors] |
July 17, 2001, 05:28 |
sweep problem
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear friends,
Solving a 2D (axial symetrical cylindrical geometry) unsteady heat conduction prob using a finite differences scheme, I am using TDMA as a solver. I noticed that if I use it in axial direction the solution is very fast. However if I use TDMA in radial direction, the solution obtained takes time and is almost 7 times longer to get than in axial direction. I think the main reason is due to the boundary conditions existing in those directions, since in axial direction both boundaries are at constant temperature. However such usfull information doesn't exist in radial direction. This order of selection is called by Patankar "the sweep". Is it true or I am wrong and there is another reason due to a serious problem in my program itself ??? Thank you for your contributions |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UDF compiling problem | Wouter | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 6 | June 6, 2012 04:43 |
Problem in implementing cht | tilek | CFX | 3 | May 8, 2011 08:39 |
natural convection problem for a CHT problem | Se-Hee | CFX | 2 | June 10, 2007 06:29 |
Adiabatic and Rotating wall (Convection problem) | ParodDav | CFX | 5 | April 29, 2007 19:13 |
Is this problem well posed? | Thomas P. Abraham | Main CFD Forum | 5 | September 8, 1999 14:52 |