|
[Sponsors] |
September 9, 2004, 20:31 |
Crank Nicholson
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi --
Could someone tell me what the exact disadvantages of Crank Nicholson scheme are (when used to solve the Navier Stokes Equations)? I know that there exists a CFL condition when stability is analyzed in the max norm, but there is no restriction when analyzed in the 2-norm. I also know that for more than 1-D Crank Nicholson may be too expensive to invert (hence the use of ADI, etc). What do you think are the main reasons that people prefer not to use Crank Nicholson (or, maybe, prefer to use it)? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LES of turbulent channel flows | cedric_duprat | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 220 | November 18, 2019 04:19 |
About the Use of Crank Nicholson scheme | And | OpenFOAM | 1 | November 14, 2017 12:25 |
Crank Nicholson scheme for Laplacian failed | Cyp | OpenFOAM | 3 | July 19, 2010 07:58 |
Using both backward timeScheme/Crank Nicholson for LES | And | OpenFOAM | 0 | December 2, 2009 04:17 |
Help!!How can I label crank angle on post picture? | Duan J Q | Siemens | 4 | October 10, 2007 08:20 |