|
[Sponsors] |
July 8, 2005, 08:18 |
AMG+FVM
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello everybody:
I would like to point out some questions about algebraic multigrid (AMG) applied to an algorithm that solves the uncoupled Navier-Stokes equations with pressure poisson equation with a finite volume method (FVM). (I have been working with the lid driven cavity benchmark) I only apply AMG over the pressure poisson equation and, in each iteration, I must calculate the Galerkin operators since the coefficients of the pressure matrix changes each time, so it takes a long time. And although, the number of iterations for the convergence goes down with AMG, the total time of the algorithm increases. So I think, AMG is better for FEM (because the Galerkin operators only have to be calculated one time) instead of FVM, am I right, if not why not? Thank-you very much for your time and for your replies. I would like to say that the information about multigrid in this page is really good,congratulations! Isa |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
v4 & AMG warning msg | more work | Siemens | 9 | September 7, 2022 09:10 |
Quarter Burner mesh with periosic condition | SamCanuck | FLUENT | 2 | August 31, 2011 11:34 |
AMG versus ICCG | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | November 7, 2006 15:15 |
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM | kenn | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 18, 2004 18:28 |
References for FVM | Anthony Wachs | Main CFD Forum | 8 | February 20, 2002 19:23 |