|
[Sponsors] |
[Commercial meshers] Mesh independence not "converging" |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 29, 2021, 05:57 |
Mesh independence not "converging"
|
#1 |
New Member
Kai Salscheider
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 7 |
Dear forum,
I want to simulate laminar jets of nitrogen pointed on a hot surface through multiple inlet variations. The geometry is shown in the following picture. The blue dots are inlets, the refinement boxes on the sides of the domain are outlets. Its a plain simple box with some inlet/outlet extension and symmetry on the side missing the outlet refinement. furnaceAtm_measurements.jpg I started with simpleFoam as a first indicator and want to model buoyancy effects later on. From 22M cells on the results look promising physically. Before, the flow is all over the place, as you can see in the following 2 screenshots. The Threshold of the highlighted cells reaches from U=0.1 to max U 4.3M cells: Uglyph_4.3MCells.jpg 40M cells: Uglyph_40MCells.jpg I compare the volume average velocities as an indicator of mesh convergence but further refinement does not lead to converging results, I can't even see a trend in the attached graph, especially for Ux. After gradual refinement I ended up with a 40M cell behemoth with a cell length of 1 mm in the coarse volume, up to 0.06 mm in the refined areas and 10 very thin growing layers. Detailed screenshots and a case without mesh are uploaded to oneDrive, the checkMesh results are attached at the end of the post. volAvgU.jpg Question: Am I refining the right places in the mesh and what can I do to achieve mesh convergence? My machine is on it's limit with 40M cells CheckMesh: Code:
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*\ ========= | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox \\ / O peration | Website: https://openfoam.org \\ / A nd | Version: 8 \\/ M anipulation | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ Build : 8-1c9b5879390b Exec : checkMesh -allGeometry -allTopology Date : Jun 29 2021 Time : 11:11:08 Host : "ipl-pc271" PID : 4074 I/O : uncollated Case : /home/ksalscheider/projects/pruefstand_mb125/run/V1/comfortHotRoom_40M_sizeBoxes_layers_buoyantSimpleFoam_simpleFoamInit nProcs : 1 sigFpe : Enabling floating point exception trapping (FOAM_SIGFPE). fileModificationChecking : Monitoring run-time modified files using timeStampMaster (fileModificationSkew 10) allowSystemOperations : Allowing user-supplied system call operations // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // Create time Create polyMesh for time = 0 Enabling all (cell, face, edge, point) topology checks. Enabling all geometry checks. Time = 0 Mesh stats points: 30043880 faces: 108203165 internal faces: 107332983 cells: 39829127 faces per cell: 5.41152 boundary patches: 19 point zones: 0 face zones: 1 cell zones: 2 Overall number of cells of each type: hexahedra: 26938846 prisms: 554311 wedges: 0 pyramids: 1787637 tet wedges: 0 tetrahedra: 10548333 polyhedra: 0 Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Cell to face addressing OK. Point usage OK. Upper triangular ordering OK. Face vertices OK. Topological cell zip-up check OK. Face-face connectivity OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces... Patch Faces Points Surface topology Bounding box symmetrie 62190 62887 ok (non-closed singly connected) tiegelwand 127818 129099 ok (non-closed singly connected) schmelzbadoberflaeche292649 293417 ok (non-closed singly connected) tiegeldeckel 288994 289301 ok (non-closed singly connected) outlets 62500 65078 ok (non-closed singly connected) inlet_A1 922 934 ok (non-closed singly connected) inlet_A2 946 964 ok (non-closed singly connected) inlet_A5 904 923 ok (non-closed singly connected) inlet_B1 957 974 ok (non-closed singly connected) inlet_C1 920 938 ok (non-closed singly connected) inlet_C2 930 944 ok (non-closed singly connected) inlet_C3 915 927 ok (non-closed singly connected) inlet_C4 907 922 ok (non-closed singly connected) inlet_C5 944 966 ok (non-closed singly connected) inlet_C6 913 933 ok (non-closed singly connected) inlet_C7 919 938 ok (non-closed singly connected) inlet_C8 918 935 ok (non-closed singly connected) inletChannels 17136 18144 ok (non-closed singly connected) outletChannels 7800 10412 ok (non-closed singly connected) Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (-0.301 3.97904e-16 -0.08) (0.301 0.301 0.001) Mesh has 3 geometric (non-empty/wedge) directions (1 1 1) Mesh has 3 solution (non-empty) directions (1 1 1) Boundary openness (6.57636e-16 6.98591e-16 4.23246e-15) OK. Max cell openness = 4.70579e-16 OK. Max aspect ratio = 120.444 OK. Minimum face area = 3.04033e-10. Maximum face area = 2.33772e-06. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 2.98042e-15. Max volume = 1.04958e-09. Total volume = 0.01441. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 59.9915 average: 10.9556 Non-orthogonality check OK. Face pyramids OK. Max skewness = 1.35357 OK. Coupled point location match (average 0) OK. Face tets OK. Min/max edge length = 1.86863e-06 0.00183555 OK. All angles in faces OK. Face flatness (1 = flat, 0 = butterfly) : min = 0.951441 average = 0.999999 All face flatness OK. Cell determinant (wellposedness) : minimum: 2.47088e-06 average: 5.07848 ***Cells with small determinant (< 0.001) found, number of cells: 1464477 <<Writing 1464477 under-determined cells to set underdeterminedCells Concave cell check OK. Face interpolation weight : minimum: 0.0624713 average: 0.471401 Face interpolation weight check OK. Face volume ratio : minimum: 0.066634 average: 0.898815 Face volume ratio check OK. Failed 1 mesh checks. End |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sliding mesh problem in CFX | Saima | CFX | 46 | September 11, 2021 07:38 |
[snappyHexMesh] High quality mesh for wind in complex urban environment | ziboaa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | January 12, 2021 15:33 |
GeometricField -> mesh() Function | Tobi | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 10 | November 19, 2020 11:33 |
Transient mode simulation (VoF model) mesh independence study problem | yulu | FLUENT | 4 | September 20, 2016 17:30 |
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 09:38 |