|
[Sponsors] |
[snappyHexMesh] Saving cells in SHM 3D to 2D: Is my strategy silly or smart ;-)? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 16, 2024, 09:06 |
Saving cells in SHM 3D to 2D: Is my strategy silly or smart ;-)?
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2022
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4 |
Hi foamers,
I want to make a 2D mesh with SHM. I can do this with extrudeMesh. the problem is, that first, a 3D mesh is generated which needs a lot of RAM and makes the whole process slow. So, I tried to define the refinement regions just at the patch, that I want to extrude. Eg. width of object = 0.1, but the refinement region would only go from 0 to 0.001. this saves a lot of cells and computation time. the problem is, that my extrudeMeshDict seems so stop working with this approach. If anyone could help me with that, I would be very glad. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] Too many cells in undesired part, very less cells in desirable part | Ash Kot | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | August 7, 2023 15:56 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh stuck when snap is turned on | yukuns | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | February 2, 2021 14:05 |
[snappyHexMesh] sHM layer process keeps getting killed | MBttR | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 4 | August 15, 2016 04:21 |
[OpenFOAM.org] Compile OF 2.3 on Mac OS X .... the patch | gschaider | OpenFOAM Installation | 225 | August 25, 2015 20:43 |
physical boundary error!! | kris | Siemens | 2 | August 3, 2005 01:32 |