CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Question on transient simulation in OpenFOAM and FLUENT

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By nicklj

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   May 6, 2014, 23:13
Question Question on transient simulation in OpenFOAM and FLUENT
  #1
New Member
 
Liu Jun
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 12
nicklj is on a distinguished road
Dear all:
Recently I'm trying to use OpenFOAM to simulate transient incompressible flow, and have some questions to inquire.

I know that in FLUENT, for transient flow, iterations are required within each time step, to confirm the result can converge at the end of the current time step. The default value is 20, which means if the result cannot converge within 20 iterations, the solver will march into next time step. This is normally how the transient solver works in my mind.

However, when perform transient simulation in OpenFOAM, using either PISO or PIMPLE, it seems that no iteration is required within one time step (Of course iterations are still required when solving equations, that's not my question). This can be seen clearly from one section of the log file:

Code:
Courant Number mean: 0.279317 max: 0.999569
deltaT = 0.00175747
Time = 5.92794

DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 8.03872e-05, Final residual = 3.01259e-10, No Iterations 4
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 7.47932e-05, Final residual = 2.18265e-10, No Iterations 4
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 5.96536e-05, Final residual = 1.09994e-10, No Iterations 4
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.000123055, Final residual = 4.66822e-10, No Iterations 10
time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.54552e-12, global = 2.47586e-13, cumulative = -4.13283e-11
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 2.08618e-05, Final residual = 6.33155e-10, No Iterations 8
time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.09623e-12, global = -2.88986e-13, cumulative = -4.16173e-11
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for epsilon, Initial residual = 2.95649e-05, Final residual = 9.94966e-11, No Iterations 4
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 4.52894e-05, Final residual = 6.86864e-10, No Iterations 4
ExecutionTime = 3449.02 s  ClockTime = 3453 s

Courant Number mean: 0.279319 max: 0.999571
deltaT = 0.00175747
Time = 5.9297

DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 8.04511e-05, Final residual = 2.77023e-10, No Iterations 4
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 7.47824e-05, Final residual = 2.18558e-10, No Iterations 4
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 5.97415e-05, Final residual = 1.09586e-10, No Iterations 4
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.000123775, Final residual = 5.54077e-10, No Iterations 10
time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.83445e-12, global = 2.88968e-13, cumulative = -4.13283e-11
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 2.07948e-05, Final residual = 5.90437e-10, No Iterations 8
time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.95485e-12, global = -2.66983e-13, cumulative = -4.15953e-11
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for epsilon, Initial residual = 2.95488e-05, Final residual = 9.23568e-11, No Iterations 4
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 4.52872e-05, Final residual = 4.31262e-10, No Iterations 4
ExecutionTime = 3449.6 s  ClockTime = 3453 s
It is clear that between time 5.92794 and 5.9297, only one standard PIMPLE step is performed, and no iteration occurs to confirm convergence at the end of this time step. In "fvSchemes", I've already assign "ddtSchemes" to be "Euler", so I think it should be an implicit time discretization.

May I ask why this happens? Actually the same situation happens in the "pitzDaily" case in the tutorial pimpleFoam directory, so I think maybe this is some mechanism exist in OpenFOAM. Can anyone help me to explain it?

Thank you very much!
nicklj is offline   Reply With Quote

 

Tags
fluent, iteration, transient


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Possible Bug in pimpleFoam (or createPatch) (or fluent3DMeshToFoam) cfdonline2mohsen OpenFOAM 3 October 21, 2013 09:28
FLUENT or OpenFoam for Particle-surface intercation simulation? Amir1 Main CFD Forum 0 May 10, 2013 17:15
Question: BC openFOAM vs. FLUENT oehmu OpenFOAM 2 December 14, 2010 16:14
Fluent elbow in Openfoam chemeng OpenFOAM 1 January 21, 2010 03:52
OpenFOAM vs Fluent for cylinder at Re%3d150 lr103476 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 40 December 18, 2008 09:09


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:11.