|
[Sponsors] |
Question on transient simulation in OpenFOAM and FLUENT |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 6, 2014, 23:13 |
Question on transient simulation in OpenFOAM and FLUENT
|
#1 |
New Member
Liu Jun
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 12 |
Dear all:
Recently I'm trying to use OpenFOAM to simulate transient incompressible flow, and have some questions to inquire. I know that in FLUENT, for transient flow, iterations are required within each time step, to confirm the result can converge at the end of the current time step. The default value is 20, which means if the result cannot converge within 20 iterations, the solver will march into next time step. This is normally how the transient solver works in my mind. However, when perform transient simulation in OpenFOAM, using either PISO or PIMPLE, it seems that no iteration is required within one time step (Of course iterations are still required when solving equations, that's not my question). This can be seen clearly from one section of the log file: Code:
Courant Number mean: 0.279317 max: 0.999569 deltaT = 0.00175747 Time = 5.92794 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 8.03872e-05, Final residual = 3.01259e-10, No Iterations 4 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 7.47932e-05, Final residual = 2.18265e-10, No Iterations 4 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 5.96536e-05, Final residual = 1.09994e-10, No Iterations 4 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.000123055, Final residual = 4.66822e-10, No Iterations 10 time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.54552e-12, global = 2.47586e-13, cumulative = -4.13283e-11 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 2.08618e-05, Final residual = 6.33155e-10, No Iterations 8 time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.09623e-12, global = -2.88986e-13, cumulative = -4.16173e-11 DILUPBiCG: Solving for epsilon, Initial residual = 2.95649e-05, Final residual = 9.94966e-11, No Iterations 4 DILUPBiCG: Solving for k, Initial residual = 4.52894e-05, Final residual = 6.86864e-10, No Iterations 4 ExecutionTime = 3449.02 s ClockTime = 3453 s Courant Number mean: 0.279319 max: 0.999571 deltaT = 0.00175747 Time = 5.9297 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 8.04511e-05, Final residual = 2.77023e-10, No Iterations 4 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 7.47824e-05, Final residual = 2.18558e-10, No Iterations 4 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 5.97415e-05, Final residual = 1.09586e-10, No Iterations 4 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.000123775, Final residual = 5.54077e-10, No Iterations 10 time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.83445e-12, global = 2.88968e-13, cumulative = -4.13283e-11 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 2.07948e-05, Final residual = 5.90437e-10, No Iterations 8 time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.95485e-12, global = -2.66983e-13, cumulative = -4.15953e-11 DILUPBiCG: Solving for epsilon, Initial residual = 2.95488e-05, Final residual = 9.23568e-11, No Iterations 4 DILUPBiCG: Solving for k, Initial residual = 4.52872e-05, Final residual = 4.31262e-10, No Iterations 4 ExecutionTime = 3449.6 s ClockTime = 3453 s May I ask why this happens? Actually the same situation happens in the "pitzDaily" case in the tutorial pimpleFoam directory, so I think maybe this is some mechanism exist in OpenFOAM. Can anyone help me to explain it? Thank you very much! |
|
Tags |
fluent, iteration, transient |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Possible Bug in pimpleFoam (or createPatch) (or fluent3DMeshToFoam) | cfdonline2mohsen | OpenFOAM | 3 | October 21, 2013 09:28 |
FLUENT or OpenFoam for Particle-surface intercation simulation? | Amir1 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 10, 2013 17:15 |
Question: BC openFOAM vs. FLUENT | oehmu | OpenFOAM | 2 | December 14, 2010 16:14 |
Fluent elbow in Openfoam | chemeng | OpenFOAM | 1 | January 21, 2010 03:52 |
OpenFOAM vs Fluent for cylinder at Re%3d150 | lr103476 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 40 | December 18, 2008 09:09 |