|
[Sponsors] |
Running a turbulent case by using a laminar solution |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 4, 2017, 23:29 |
Running a turbulent case by using a laminar solution
|
#1 |
Senior Member
TWB
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 402
Rep Power: 19 |
Hi,
I have been trying to run a hypersonic double cone problem with turbulence modelling. Using komega-sst, the omega diverged after 3-4 time steps. I changed to another model and the same thing happens. So I tried to run my case using my previous laminar solution, which completed w/p problem. To reach steady state, I ran until t=0.005 in the laminar case. So I tried to use the laminar solution at t=0.0002 to start my turbulent case, and let it run till 0.005. Is this a reasonable or correct way to simulate a turbulent case? Another online study suggested running at a low Re 1st, then increasing the Re to the actual one as time proceeds. Is that ok too? Thanks. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Laminar vs Turbulent Navier-Stokes | truman | Main CFD Forum | 8 | July 10, 2017 07:20 |
Wrong adjoint solution ONERA M6 euler test case | JanH | SU2 | 6 | March 6, 2015 11:58 |
[GAMBIT] 3D Boundary Layer Laminar and Turbulent meshing | Harald D | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | July 7, 2009 06:20 |
Half laminar and turbulent model trying to solve | Andrew Clarke | FLUENT | 5 | May 19, 2008 13:40 |
IcoFoam parallel woes | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | July 22, 2007 02:58 |