August 24, 2021, 01:54
|
2D and 3D geometry influence to the CFD result
|
#1
|
|
New Member
BC
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 4
|
The sonicFoam turbulence model is used to solve the ejector CFD problem. When using the 2D ejector geometry and mesh, the result is good, but when using the 3D geometry and mesh (generated by the ansys fluent), there is only 4 time step before stopped without any error.
The boundary conditions are not changed. Dose anyone know what the solution of this problem is? because of the 3D mesh quality?
|
|
|
Threaded Mode
