|
[Sponsors] |
Same OF version but different results for different OS |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 26, 2021, 13:30 |
Same OF version but different results for different OS
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 10 |
Dear all,
I'm using OpenFOAM v2012 on a computer with the Ubuntu 20.04 OS. Now I also installed it (v2012) on a new computer with a more recent hardware, the new operative system is Ubuntu 21.10. I'm doing some test to check the performances; however I'm registering different behaviours between the two computers. The sequece of operations involves: surfaceFeatureExtract blockMesh snappyHexMesh decomposePar extrudeMesh createPatch potentialFoam changeDictionary buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam The resulting meshes are identical, indeed the two checkMesh logs give the same output. All the logfiles are identical (as expected with different execution times) until the execution of potentialFoam. The first difference I noticed is in potentialFoam: the Interpolated velocity error is 1.46919e-06 for PC1 and 0.00893802 for PC2 Finaly the buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam of PC2 diverges after few iterations, the maximum velocity is very high since iteration 1. The buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam results in PC2 diverges also skipping the potentialFoam. Why the results are different? Attached are the potentialFoam and buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam log files. comparison.zip Thanks! WhiteW |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MRF SimpleFoam - Wind Turbine Blade - Underestimating forces | hgropelli | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | March 16, 2022 06:32 |
Solvers in OpenFOAM for LES + heat transfer | arun1994 | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 26, 2021 07:57 |
My results become inconsistent when using PIMPLE (nOuterCorrectors>1) instead of PISO | FloB | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | May 17, 2021 06:17 |
NACA0012 validation with different OF version | Ivangzp | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | February 17, 2021 11:34 |
Problem: Very long "write" time (~2h-3h) for results and transient results | Shawn_A | CFX | 16 | April 12, 2016 20:49 |