|
[Sponsors] |
April 15, 2008, 08:50 |
Hi All,
I tried installing
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Nishant
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Glasgow, UK
Posts: 166
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi All,
I tried installing and recompiling your timeVaryingNonuniformFixedValue patch with my OF-1.4.1 installation. But unfortunately I found some error while recompiling it. Can you tell me, what's going wrong? The error reported is: lnInclude/fixedValueFvPatchField.C:41: note: Foam::fixedValueFvPatchField<type>::fixedValueFvPa tchField(const Foam::fvPatch&, const Foam::DimensionedField<type,>&) [with Type = double] make: *** [Make/linuxGccDPOpt/timeVaryingNonuniformFixedValueFvPatchFields.o] Error 1 regards, Nishant
__________________
Thanks and regards, Nishant |
|
July 1, 2009, 10:38 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
Is this tool going to work with OpenFOAM 1.5?
The file structure of http://openfoamwiki.net/images/d/db/...FixedValue.tgz is not the same as with the current release...
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
July 2, 2009, 02:30 |
|
#3 |
Member
Norman Del Puppo
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hinwil, CH
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
I used the OpenFOAM-1.5.x for some time and a full working version of the timeVaryingUniformFixedValue was already included in the source packages, therefore I think you could avoid the porting of an old version ;-) Regards Norman |
|
July 2, 2009, 03:01 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
Yes, of course. But I am talking about the NONUNIFORM version ...
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
July 2, 2009, 04:39 |
|
#5 |
Member
Norman Del Puppo
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hinwil, CH
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 17 |
I'm sorry,
you are right, I misread your post. Regards Norman |
|
July 2, 2009, 05:05 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
No problem. Am I guessing right, that groovyBC is the current 'state of the art' to handle such problems?
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
July 2, 2009, 06:30 |
|
#7 |
Member
Norman Del Puppo
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hinwil, CH
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 17 |
I think it could be a good choice, it is really versatile to accomplish many different tasks and it is easy to set-up (the contrib web page also contains many examples).
Norman |
|
July 2, 2009, 07:15 |
|
#8 |
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
Depends (not sure what the timeVaryingNonuniform actually does). The time-dependence can be read from a file but for the spatial dependence currently only analytical expressions are possible (no reading of velocity profiles from files) only "analytical" expressions
|
|
|
|