CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Nonphysical flow field while using coodles solver

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   November 24, 2007, 17:18
Default Hello, I am using coodles s
  #1
Member
 
Ankur Gupta
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 17
ankgupta8um is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am using coodles solver in OpenFOAM 1.4.1 to simulate flow through a cylinder. The computational domain is very simple and consists of an annular pipe attached to a cylinder. This is an expansion problem where the flow through the annular pipe expands into the cylinder (annular jet expanding into a cylindrical pipe). The boundary conditions I am using are:
- fixed value velocity inlet at the annular cross-section; zero gradient for pressure.
- no-slip walls for annlar pipe and cylindrical pipe; zero gradient for pressure.
- waveTrnasmissive pressure BC at the downstream end of the cylinder; inletOutlet BC for velocity.

I am not able to get a reasonable flow field in the computational domain. It seems to me that the unphysical pressure waves in the domain are destroying the numerical solution. Initially, I used the default solver settings as given in the pitzdaily tutorial. Then I tried using recommended convective discretization schemes (eg, fliteredLinear) for LES but that didn't help. I also tried using upwind scheme with the hope that the increased dissipation will dissipate out the spurious pressure waves, but that also didn't help.
I tried different initializations at the start of the run (starting from the RANS solution, starting from a quiscent medium) but all led to unphysical flow field.

I think that the unphysical pressure waves are destroying the solution. The reason being: I ran a case where instead of using walls for the cylindrical surface, I used pressure transmissive boundaries (i.e., no confinement; annular jet expanding into an eclosure with pressure transmissive boundaries at the cylindrical periphery and at the downstream end). For this case, I could get a physical flow field. That suggests that the numerical disturbances in the form of spurious pressure waves exit the computational domain from the peripheral boundary of the cylinder when pressure Transmissibe BC is used there. When wall is used it reflects back and destroys the solution.

I have been trying to resolve this issue in coodles with the use of walls close to the jet for quite some time now but haven't had any success. I am stuck with this issue and need to resolve it in order to make some progress.

I would really appreciate it if someone can throw some light on what the potential causes for this problem are and how to resolve it. People having similar experiences with coodles are kindly requested to share them with the forum. Any information on getting coodles solver to work is also welcome !!

Thanks!
Regards,
Ankur
ankgupta8um is offline   Reply With Quote

 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Coodles anja OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 33 January 14, 2010 09:05
Nonphysical volume fractions at multiphase inlet sylvester OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 July 1, 2009 10:52
Coodles vs sonicTurbFoam hsieh OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 10 February 3, 2009 06:17
Re: supersonic free jet nonphysical solution?? Patti Phoenics 0 October 23, 2008 21:12
User Solver in FoamX with a new field variable vvqf OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 2 October 28, 2005 20:24


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:52.