CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

Divergence only by lengthening of simulated geometry, buoyantPimpleFoam

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   March 12, 2014, 04:34
Default Divergence only by lengthening of simulated geometry, buoyantPimpleFoam
  #1
New Member
 
Carl-Magnus Arvhult
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 12
arvhult is on a distinguished road
Hi guys! I am totally new to this forums, and am looking for some input on a matter of simulating purely buoyancy-driven flow.

I have a model of a vertical pipe with inversely stratified water, the interface being in the centre. The top water is 370 K and the bottom is 470 K. I have used NIST to produce my own polynomials for water properties. The pressure is 7 MPa, and I am absolutely certain the polynomials are valid outside of my temperature interval. The solver is buoyantPimpleFoam, so that heat transfer is also modeled.

So when relaxed, the water should mix by buoyancy forces. My 250 cm long pipe with 20 cm diameter doesn't diverge, but multiplying the length by 8 (and thus also the number of cells) does. The pressure field reaches 1001 iterations in every time step, and after about 0.9 seconds the residual is too great. Any other parameter is solved for in 1 iteration. It is apparent to me that most probably the buoyancy forces become too great, and the vast acceleration of the fluid parcels simply make the physics problematic. I myself understand the physics and fluid mechanics, and recieved help from a teacher in setting the numerics, e.g. correctors and relaxation, etc. My only set boundary conditions except zeroGradient in temperature, and no-slip in U, is 7 MPa pressure on top, and fixedFluxPressure on the walls.

I have set nOuterCorrectors to 3, and nonOrthogonalCorrectors 0 (changing the latter didn't make a difference, I found). I have a relaxation factor of 0.5 for all parameters. in controlDict i juse adjustable time steps, with a maximum Co of 0.5. With 8 CPUs, I simply decompose the pipe vertically and solve in parallel.

Other than the lengthening, the model is completely identical to the one that did not diverge. QUESTION: Is there any way to make this model work, other than refining the mesh so much that it becomes unpractical to finish the simulation within reasonable times? I am running the finer mesh now (3 million cells), but so far there are only slightly lower residuals in p_rgh.

(I am validating the model against an experiment, so I need at least 150 seconds of the simulations. With 8 CPU's at hand, that time is precious to my project.)

Thank you for any input
arvhult is offline   Reply With Quote

 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] O-grid around wing geometry Anorky ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 15 November 27, 2017 13:43
Importing CAD geometry and Editing edges to match Ahmed CFX 15 March 21, 2016 12:39
Simulation of Flow through Complex 3D Geometry EmersonKB CFX 5 July 2, 2009 08:17
vitual _ real deneb FLUENT 3 January 22, 2007 04:31
Virtual/Real geometry. Jack Keays FLUENT 9 June 15, 2000 23:39


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:21.