CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > REEF3D

Persistent problems with scour in submarine outfalls.

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 19, 2022, 06:21
Default Persistent problems with scour in submarine outfalls.
  #1
New Member
 
Hernest
Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 4
raul_xusernamex_ is on a distinguished road
Hi, very good evening.
Some time ago I had asked for help to find a code configuration that would allow me to visualize the change in bed as a result of the interaction of the pipe and the wave forcing (that is, scour). Following said indications and suggestion from the other time, I have refined the code in the following way to try to find what I need. (Lo in the attached image).
I understand that a module for sediment transport is still being developed. According to the theory and the help answers from the other time, they have made me put together the code that I show up to now, having the current image which did not make the sediment bed change under the pipe.

For example, I have taken a good look at how to determine the Shields parameter using the diagram as a function of the Reynolds number or the characteristic diameter D50 property of the sediment, depending on the wave condition.

I have determined the wave height to start the incipient movement in the sediments with the help of the formulation proposed by Van Rinj.


Am I entering some parameter or command inappropriately or am I missing some important command?

Or am I not displaying the simulation output correctly through Paraview?

Other Query: There are no concrete examples to use the S 73 command. How could this option help me to move sediments since, for example, it admits 3 arguments, right?
For example I would tentatively add as follows.
S 73 0 8 0 followed by x-origin and y-origin
where the first argument is that it is the coordinate z = 0 (where the sediment layer begins), the second corresponds to a distance... I would put 8 according to the numerical domain and finally 0 which is an angle.
The x-origin and y-origin coordinates. I am not clear where to place them or how to enter them.

Greetings, thank you very much for the help of the other time, and waiting again one more time.

Control.txt.

C 11 6
C 12 3
C 13 3
C 14 8
C 15 21
C 16 3

B 1 0.02
B 10 -4.4 4.4 0.0 0.02 -0.3 1.0

S 32 0.0 0.1 0.05

M 20 2

M 10 4

Ctrl.txt.

B 10 1
B 50 0.0001
B 90 1
B 91 0.15 2.46
B 92 4
B 98 3
B 99 4

D 10 4
D 20 2
D 30 1

F 30 3
F 35 4
F 40 3
F 42 1.0
F 60 0.40

I 12 1

N 10 14
N 11 11
N 40 3
N 41 60.0
N 47 0.1
N 48 1

M 10 4

P 10 1
P 14 1
P 23 1
P 25 1
P 30 0.1
P 40 1
P 42 1.0

S 10 1
S 11 2
S 12 0
S 13 30
S 14 0.3
S 15 2
S 16 1
S 20 0.00058
S 21 3
S 22 2700
S 24 0.4
S 25 45
S 30 0.03
S 32 4
S 41 3
S 47 5
S 48 5
S 57 0
S 71 -3.0
S 72 3.0
S 77 -3.0 4.1
S 80 2
S 90 1

T 10 2

W 22 -9.81

P 52 0.01
P 53 1
P 78 1
P 79 1
P 122 1
P 123 0.01
P 126 1
P 180 1


P 61 -2.5 0.01 0.1
P 61 -2.5 0.01 0.02
P 61 -2.5 0.01 0.30

P 61 0.0 0.01 0.25
P 61 0.0 0.01 0.02
P 61 0.0 0.01 0.30

P 61 2.5 0.01 0.25

P 61 1.0 0.01 0.1
P 61 1.0 0.01 0.02
P 61 1.0 0.01 0.30

P 51 -2.5 0.01
P 51 0.0 0.01
P 51 1.0 0.01
P 51 2.5 0.01
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ayuda pipeline 2.jpg (94.0 KB, 38 views)
File Type: jpg iteracion pipeline 2.jpg (104.6 KB, 20 views)
raul_xusernamex_ is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 19, 2022, 06:37
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Hernest
Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 4
raul_xusernamex_ is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by raul_xusernamex_ View Post
Hi, very good evening.
Some time ago I had asked for help to find a code configuration that would allow me to visualize the change in bed as a result of the interaction of the pipe and the wave forcing (that is, scour). Following said indications and suggestion from the other time, I have refined the code in the following way to try to find what I need. (Lo in the attached image).
I understand that a module for sediment transport is still being developed. According to the theory and the help answers from the other time, they have made me put together the code that I show up to now, having the current image which did not make the sediment bed change under the pipe.

For example, I have taken a good look at how to determine the Shields parameter using the diagram as a function of the Reynolds number or the characteristic diameter D50 property of the sediment, depending on the wave condition.

I have determined the wave height to start the incipient movement in the sediments with the help of the formulation proposed by Van Rinj.


Am I entering some parameter or command inappropriately or am I missing some important command?

Or am I not displaying the simulation output correctly through Paraview?

Other Query: There are no concrete examples to use the S 73 command. How could this option help me to move sediments since, for example, it admits 3 arguments, right?
For example I would tentatively add as follows.
S 73 0 8 0 followed by x-origin and y-origin
where the first argument is that it is the coordinate z = 0 (where the sediment layer begins), the second corresponds to a distance... I would put 8 according to the numerical domain and finally 0 which is an angle.
The x-origin and y-origin coordinates. I am not clear where to place them or how to enter them.

Greetings, thank you very much for the help of the other time, and waiting again one more time.

Control.txt.

C 11 6
C 12 3
C 13 3
C 14 8
C 15 21
C 16 3

B 1 0.02
B 10 -4.4 4.4 0.0 0.02 -0.3 1.0

S 32 0.0 0.1 0.05

M 20 2

M 10 4

Ctrl.txt.

B 10 1
B 50 0.0001
B 90 1
B 91 0.15 2.46
B 92 4
B 98 3
B 99 4

D 10 4
D 20 2
D 30 1

F 30 3
F 35 4
F 40 3
F 42 1.0
F 60 0.40

I 12 1

N 10 14
N 11 11
N 40 3
N 41 60.0
N 47 0.1
N 48 1

M 10 4

P 10 1
P 14 1
P 23 1
P 25 1
P 30 0.1
P 40 1
P 42 1.0

S 10 1
S 11 2
S 12 0
S 13 30
S 14 0.3
S 15 2
S 16 1
S 20 0.00058
S 21 3
S 22 2700
S 24 0.4
S 25 45
S 30 0.03
S 32 4
S 41 3
S 47 5
S 48 5
S 57 0
S 71 -3.0
S 72 3.0
S 77 -3.0 4.1
S 80 2
S 90 1

T 10 2

W 22 -9.81

P 52 0.01
P 53 1
P 78 1
P 79 1
P 122 1
P 123 0.01
P 126 1
P 180 1


P 61 -2.5 0.01 0.1
P 61 -2.5 0.01 0.02
P 61 -2.5 0.01 0.30

P 61 0.0 0.01 0.25
P 61 0.0 0.01 0.02
P 61 0.0 0.01 0.30

P 61 2.5 0.01 0.25

P 61 1.0 0.01 0.1
P 61 1.0 0.01 0.02
P 61 1.0 0.01 0.30

P 51 -2.5 0.01
P 51 0.0 0.01
P 51 1.0 0.01
P 51 2.5 0.01
Envio mejor los archivos de entrada.
Attached Files
File Type: txt control.txt (127 Bytes, 8 views)
File Type: txt ctrl.txt (820 Bytes, 8 views)
raul_xusernamex_ is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] Problems with coedge curves and surfaces tommymoose ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 6 December 1, 2020 11:12
Hydrodynamic analysis of submarine model with ANSYS FLUENT? Sovereignty ANSYS 0 January 20, 2019 18:36
problems when using sediment scour model mengchen FLOW-3D 1 August 22, 2018 13:18
[ICEM] Hexa blocking a simple submarine siw ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 April 12, 2014 12:46
scour under submarine pipelines exposed to steady flow kjelban FLOW-3D 7 February 6, 2014 20:20


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52.