|
[Sponsors] |
October 6, 2000, 09:17 |
samm vs. ICEM
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
ProAm from adapco appears to offer many advantages to STAR-CD users. I currently use ICEM Tetra/Prism in conjunction with the direct CAD interface to I-DEAS, and to be honest, I am relatively satisfied with this combination. However, all to frequently, I get frustrated over the many difficulties with generating prisms on my tetmeshes. If this step could be left out, I would probably cut my meshing time with two thirds - at least.
If anyone has experience with both ICEM and ProAm/samm, I would really appreciate to hear your opinions on the strong and weak points of the two softwares, however subjective they may be. Thanks in advance. Lars Ola |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
icem | suresh | CFX | 0 | April 6, 2007 12:56 |
it needs to be done in ICEM-CFD *NM* | Rishi Pillai | CFX | 0 | December 20, 2005 16:05 |
SAMM users | Bart Prast | Siemens | 1 | August 24, 2000 04:34 |
SAMM meshing | D Redinger | Siemens | 1 | January 1, 2000 10:56 |
Any comment on SAMM? | Quazi | Main CFD Forum | 4 | December 2, 1999 17:29 |