|
[Sponsors] |
February 6, 2007, 01:59 |
Yplus is .5 to 3. what to do
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi
i did my analysis using Low Reynolds number K-e model. i got the Yplus value varying .5 to 3. but limitation of the K-e model is valid for yplus value in the particular range 20 to 100. i am not interested to provide a coarse mesh in near wall region (around the solid Cylinder(fin)). because i want to predict the boundray layer seperation. then how to go further. This kind of Problem may i use wall function May i neglect the Yplus value. Can you suggest me any other turbulent model for this kind of problem. |
|
February 7, 2007, 04:15 |
Re: Yplus is .5 to 3. what to do
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
y+ for Low Re number should be 1
|
|
February 8, 2007, 06:17 |
Re: Yplus is .5 to 3. what to do
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
you can use hybrid wall functions which extend the range of wall function down to about y+=1. You have to select a low re turbulence model, but you just don't need the grid intensity, or try the V2f turbulence model.
|
|
February 12, 2007, 21:46 |
Re: Yplus is .5 to 3. what to do
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think 0.5 to 3 is OK with low reynolds number models. if you are able to refine it further, it is good.
Otherwise you can proceed with current mesh |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
YPlus value -- CFX 5.7 | NeedHelp | CFX | 3 | December 7, 2004 20:46 |
Yplus | Barbaros | CFX | 3 | March 23, 2004 11:05 |
Yplus | mefpz | CFX | 7 | March 10, 2004 20:49 |
YPlus | irfan | CFX | 5 | November 20, 2002 19:59 |
YPLUS value for RSM. | cfd guy | CFX | 13 | August 8, 2001 11:16 |