|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I need to get a software for our company. Which one will be a better choice for modeling detailed combustion including turbulent flow in swirl burners? Thank you, John
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi
star-cd is years ahead of fluent wrt mesh generation to successfully solve conjugate heat transfer problems. It has superior combustion models. In my experience fluent is an over damped code. allan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Codes like these cost serious $$. Get them to prove their skills by setting them a benchmark task. Their turnaround time will be as interesting as their results.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX-5, FLUENT 6 or Star-CD? Which one is the best? | Harendra Nath Mondal | Main CFD Forum | 4 | September 7, 2004 10:45 |
which one? FLUENT, Star-CD or CFX? | M. Amin | CFX | 2 | February 14, 2004 00:21 |
which one? FLUENT, Star-CD or CFX? | M. Amin | FLUENT | 6 | February 9, 2004 03:45 |
Star-CD Vs FLUENT | Giovanni | Siemens | 8 | January 2, 2002 10:21 |