|
[Sponsors] |
December 20, 2020, 05:52 |
Direct Mesh
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 5 |
Hello all,
I am currently working on a simulation to study the aeroacoustics of an airfoil using a NACA0012 airfoil as an example. Currently I am still at the meshing stage and have already tried a few possibilities. Parts-based meshing has so far delivered quite good results in the steady-state observation, but also required a lot of cells (8.5 M). Now I have created a mesh with the direct meshing function and that looks quite good for now, but I can't think of a way to improve it. I would like to have a finer mesh behind the airfoil to resolve frequencies of 2500 Hz and to decrease the skewness in general (see pictures). Do you have an idea how or if I can realize this with the driect mesh option? Thanks a lot! Greetings Vesta |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sliding mesh problem in CFX | Saima | CFX | 46 | September 11, 2021 07:38 |
[snappyHexMesh] High quality mesh for wind in complex urban environment | ziboaa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | January 12, 2021 15:33 |
GeometricField -> mesh() Function | Tobi | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 10 | November 19, 2020 11:33 |
Star CCM Overset Mesh Error (Rotating Turbine) | thezack | Siemens | 7 | October 12, 2016 11:14 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 21:11 |