|
[Sponsors] |
February 12, 2016, 08:49 |
CA much lower than reasonable.
|
#1 |
New Member
Brittany
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10 |
I am working on a case that is giving me answers I don't believe. The CFx value I'm getting out of SU2 is about 2.6. Using the rule of thumb of a Cd value of ~2 and calculating the CFx value given the largest cross-sectional area and Sref values, the Cfx should be closer to 13. Can you please take a look at my input file and see if there is some glaring error that I'm missing?
Thank you. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What's happening to my solution for lower relaxation factor | casesam | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | October 22, 2015 01:25 |
Temperature lower than possible in closed domain | Czarulla | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 15, 2015 05:01 |
[snappyHexMesh] upper and lower patch for a 0_thick Membrane in a wind tunnel | hfs | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | October 15, 2013 16:41 |
snappyHexMesh: cell lower corner instead of cell centre | andrea.pasquali | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 4 | February 11, 2013 06:22 |
Lower heating value | Andrea | Siemens | 2 | July 30, 2007 07:19 |