|
[Sponsors] |
February 10, 2013, 08:19 |
Multiple edges & Delaunay Violation in ICEM
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Astio Lamar
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pipe
Posts: 186
Rep Power: 14 |
Hello everyone.
I have generated a kind of Hybrid mesh for a geometry. I generate two mesh Hexa and tetra , then I merge them with the Merge Meshes ==> Method ==> Merge volume meshes. I have faced with two main problem. First: I got some Delaunay violation elements in tetra part. How can solve this problem? this is an example of these element types: 2nd is in the connected edge I got some Multiple edges elements. the questions is how can I solve this problem to avoid getting multiple edges? I try to merge these two surface meshes, but everything collapsed!! I have followed the tutorial which is provided in ANSYS portal: "Mesh Merging in a Hybrid Tube" https://support.ansys.com/AnsysCusto...+a+Hybrid+Tube But here also we got Multiple Edge error: See this figure: anyway, What kind of probable problem occur during simulation with Multiple edges? and how can I solve these problems? this is also an example of multiple edges in my mesh: See figure: Last edited by asal; February 10, 2013 at 12:21. |
|
February 15, 2013, 03:44 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Astio Lamar
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pipe
Posts: 186
Rep Power: 14 |
No Idea?!!
|
|
March 22, 2013, 11:10 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 |
The dealunay violation is only an issue if you plan to run a delaunay mesher later... If you already have a tetra mesh, then you can ignore that one.
Multiple edges are simply edges with more than 2 surface elements connected. In this case, you have the side walls and the interface elements. This is listed under "possible problems" and not "errors". Your solver probably won't mind the multiple edges at all. However, if you want flow to pass thru the interface between the hexas and tetras you have two choices... Either set up the interface correctly in the solver to allow that to happen (this varies with the solver), or just delete the shells in the interface part before you export to the solver. If you decide to remove the shells in the interface part, make sure you also put the volume elements on either side into the same part or you will get an uncovered faces error (and that will cause a problem with your solver).
__________________
----------------------------------------- Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)... CFD Online Users Survey |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to set periodic boundary conditions | Ganesh | FLUENT | 15 | November 18, 2020 07:09 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow | vishwa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | June 27, 2016 09:54 |
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 10:38 |
OpenFOAM static build on Cray XT5 | asaijo | OpenFOAM Installation | 9 | April 6, 2011 13:21 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 22:11 |